BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Upton County Texas housing expert witness Upton County Texas tract home expert witness Upton County Texas low-income housing expert witness Upton County Texas office building expert witness Upton County Texas custom home expert witness Upton County Texas industrial building expert witness Upton County Texas retail construction expert witness Upton County Texas Medical building expert witness Upton County Texas multi family housing expert witness Upton County Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Upton County Texas institutional building expert witness Upton County Texas landscaping construction expert witness Upton County Texas condominiums expert witness Upton County Texas structural steel construction expert witness Upton County Texas condominium expert witness Upton County Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Upton County Texas custom homes expert witness Upton County Texas hospital construction expert witness Upton County Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Upton County Texas parking structure expert witness Upton County Texas production housing expert witness Upton County Texas
    Upton County Texas ada design expert witnessUpton County Texas expert witnesses fenestrationUpton County Texas expert witness concrete failureUpton County Texas construction expert witnessUpton County Texas construction forensic expert witnessUpton County Texas construction claims expert witnessUpton County Texas construction expert witness consultant
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Upton County, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Upton County Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Deep East Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4548
    PO Box 153337
    Lufkin, TX 75915

    Upton County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Deep East Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4548
    PO Box 153337
    Lufkin, TX 75915

    Upton County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of San Angelo
    Local # 4557
    4172 South Jackson
    San Angelo, TX 76903

    Upton County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of San Angelo
    Local # 4557
    4172 South Jackson
    San Angelo, TX 76903

    Upton County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Heart of Texas Builders Association
    Local # 4575
    PO Box 20697
    Waco, TX 76702

    Upton County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Heart of Texas Builders Association
    Local # 4575
    PO Box 20697
    Waco, TX 76702

    Upton County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Forest Country Chapter
    Local # 4555
    PO Box 630983
    Nacogdoches, TX 75963
    Upton County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Upton County Texas


    Study Finds Mansion Tax Reduced Sales in New York and New Jersey

    Another Reminder that Contracts are Powerful in Virginia

    Contractor Prevails in Part Against CalOSHA in Valley Fever Case

    Reminder: FOLLOW Your Well Drafted Contract Provisions

    Privacy In Pandemic: Senators Announce Covid-19 Data Privacy Bill

    Award Doubled in Retrial of New Jersey Elevator Injury Case

    Terminating Contracts for Convenience — “Just Because”

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “A Less Than Valiant Effort”

    Civility Is Key in Construction Defect Mediation

    Homeowner Loses Suit against Architect and Contractor of Resold Home

    Tennessee Court: Window Openings Too Small, Judgment Too Large

    Aging-in-Place Features Becoming Essential for Many Home Buyers

    Quick Note: Procure Worker’s Compensation in the Name of Your Company If You Are a General Contractor

    New York Appeals Court Rekindles the Spark

    Things You Didn't Know About Your Homeowners Policy

    Under the Hood of U.S. Construction Spending Is Revised Data

    Unintended Consequences of New Building Products and Services

    Property Damage, Occurrences, Delays, Offsets and Fees. California Decision is a Smorgasbord of Construction Insurance Issues

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    New Jersey Strengthens the Structural Integrity of Its Residential Builds

    Reminder: Know Your Contractor Licensing Rules

    Navigating the Hurdles of Florida Construction Defect Lawsuits

    New Case Alert: California Federal Court Allows Policy Stacking to Cover Continuous Injury

    Hawaii Supreme Court Paves the Way for Maui Fire Settlement to Proceed

    A New AAA Study Confirms that Arbitration is Faster to Resolution Than Court – And the Difference Can be Assessed Monetarily

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Brings Professional Development Series to Their San Antonio Office

    Housing Woes Worse in L.A. Than New York, San Francisco

    California Court Holds No Coverage Under Pollution Policy for Structural Improvements

    Specified Or Designated Operations Endorsement – Limitation of Insurance Coverage

    Fire Protection You Can Trust Starts With the Right Testing

    The California Privacy Rights Act Passed – Now What?

    Resurgent Housing Seen Cushioning U.S. From World Woes: Economy

    New York Regulator Issues Cyber Insurance Guidelines

    Buy a House or Pay Off College? $1.2 Trillion Student Debt Heats Up in Capital

    Be Aware of Two New Statutes that Became Effective May 1, 2021

    The Proposed House Green New Deal Resolution

    Fraud and Construction Contracts- Like Oil and Water?

    Homeowner's Mold Claim Denied Due to Spoilation

    Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court Clarifies Pennsylvania’s Strict Liability Standard

    California Court Affirms $1.8 Million Judgment Against HOA for Failing to Investigate and Remediate Water Intrusion

    There is No Claims File Privilege in Florida, Despite What Insurers Want You to Think

    Nobody Knows What Lies Beneath New York City

    Remodels Replace Construction in Redding

    Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Faulty Work By Subcontractor Constitutes "Occurrence"

    Haight Proudly Supports JDC's 11th Annual Bike-A-Thon Benefitting Pro Bono Legal Services

    Contractors: A Lesson on Being Friendly

    Named Insured’s Liability Found Irrelevant to Additional Insured’s Coverage Under a Landlords and Lessors Additional Insured Endorsement

    Environmental Roundup – April 2019

    No Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims under Kentucky Law
    Corporate Profile

    UPTON COUNTY TEXAS ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Upton County, Texas Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Upton County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Upton County, Texas

    Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe

    June 23, 2026 —
    Even for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing? Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers. This was the case in R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Additional Insureds Owed a Defense in Underlying Personal Injury Suit

    March 03, 2026 —
    The court granted partial summary judgment on the duty to defend to two additional insureds who were named as defendants in the underlying personal injury suit. In re Third St. Equity, LLC, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234909 (E.D. N. Y. Dec. 2, 2025). Third Street Equity LLD hired Developing NY State, LLC as the contractor for a construction project. Developing NY entered a subcontract agreement with Capital Source Concrete NY LLC for concrete work as well as labor and services for a construction project. The subcontract required that Capital Concrete keep the construction site free of debris, waste material or rubbish. Further, Capital Concrete was responsible for compliance with OSHA safety regulations. It was also agreed that Capital Concrete would obtain liability and workers compensation insurance naming Third Street and Developing NY as additional insureds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    March 10, 2026 —
    As AI-driven data center development accelerates, developers, communities and regulators are increasingly focused on water demand—both the volume required and the sources from which that water will be drawn. While industry attention has largely centered on electricity procurement and grid impacts, the availability and legal entitlement to a firm water supply has become equally material to siting, permitting and community acceptance. Particularly as surface and groundwater supplies become increasingly constrained and new projects are sited in regions experiencing tighter hydrologic conditions or growth-related supply constraints, project teams are increasingly integrating water supply analysis into early-stage development to address issues that can materially affect schedule, financing and long-term operations. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court

    June 15, 2026 —
    The Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment on a collapse claim for the insured, rejecting the insurer’s arguments that were not presented to the trial court. Homeowner’s Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins, Co. v. Oakes, 2026 Fl. App. LEXIS 2086 (Fl. Ct. App. March 18, 2026). The insured’s ceiling collapsed in the secondary home on the insured’s property. The claim was reported to the insurer, but coverage was denied after its investigation. The insured sued the insurer for breach of contract. Under the Additional Coverage provisions of the policy, collapse was covered if it was “abrupt.” An abrupt collapse was not covered, however, if exclusions for “Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot” and “faulty, inadequate or defective design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, materials or maintenance” applied. The collapse provisions contained no language stating that the coverage granted in the provision was also subject to all the other exclusions in the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Liens and the “Substantial Performance” Doctrine

    April 08, 2026 —
    In a recent case dealing with a construction lien, the driving issue was whether the air conditioning contractor “substantially performed” before recording its construction lien against residential property. The importance here pertains to the substantial performance doctrine with respect to construction liens. The Third District Court of Appeal explained, with relevant citations, this doctrine as follows: Under Florida law, a contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien if he complies with all provisions of Chapter 713, governing construction liens, and “has substantially performed the contract.” Grant v. Wester, 679 So. 2d 1301, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quotation omitted); Langley v. Knowles, 958 So. 2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“The substantial performance doctrine recognizes that a contactor who complies with all of the provisions of the contactor’s lien statute is entitled to enforce a lien if he has substantially, but not completely, performed his contractual obligations.”). Substantial performance is performance “so nearly equivalent to what was bargained for that it would be unreasonable to deny the promisee the full contract price subject to the promisor’s right to recover whatever damages may have been occasioned him by the promisee’s failure to render full performance.” Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So. 2d 72, 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    CEO: Power Isn’t the Only Electrical Challenge for AI Data Centers

    April 14, 2026 —
    Everyone knows that data centers are voracious consumers of electricity. In fact, the U.S. is currently scrambling to meet unprecedented levels of power demand not seen since the early days of electrification and the widespread adoption of air conditioning. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Francesco "Frio" Iorio, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com