BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Union County South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Union County South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Union County South Carolina tract home expert witness Union County South Carolina custom homes expert witness Union County South Carolina condominiums expert witness Union County South Carolina production housing expert witness Union County South Carolina custom home expert witness Union County South Carolina industrial building expert witness Union County South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Union County South Carolina townhome construction expert witness Union County South Carolina office building expert witness Union County South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Union County South Carolina retail construction expert witness Union County South Carolina casino resort expert witness Union County South Carolina housing expert witness Union County South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Union County South Carolina condominium expert witness Union County South Carolina institutional building expert witness Union County South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Union County South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Union County South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Union County South Carolina
    Union County South Carolina construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessUnion County South Carolina construction expert witness public projectsUnion County South Carolina consulting architect expert witnessUnion County South Carolina expert witnesses fenestrationUnion County South Carolina slope failure expert witnessUnion County South Carolina civil engineer expert witnessUnion County South Carolina construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Union County, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Union County South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379
    Union County South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379
    Union County South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679

    Union County South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679

    Union County South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association Anderson SC
    Local # 4210
    1924 McConnell Springs Rd
    Anderson, SC 29621

    Union County South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association Anderson SC
    Local # 4210
    1924 McConnell Springs Rd
    Anderson, SC 29621

    Union County South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association Lancaster Cty SC
    Local # 4230
    305 W Dunlap St C
    Lancaster, SC 29720
    Union County South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Union County South Carolina


    Waiver Of Arbitration by Not Submitting Claim to Initial Decision Maker…Really!

    Eleventh Circuit Reverses Attorneys’ Fee Award to Performance Bond Sureties in Dispute with Contractor arising from Claim against Subcontractor Performance Bond

    Prevent Costly Curb Box Damage Due on New Construction Projects

    Court Concludes That COVID-19 Losses Can Qualify as “Direct Physical Loss”

    Best U.S. Home Sales Since 2007 Show Momentum in Housing Market

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Selected to the 2016 Southern California Super Lawyers Lists

    Oklahoma Limits Claims for Construction Cases

    A Court-Side Seat: Environmental Developments on the Ninth Circuit

    Nevada Governor Signs Construction Defect Reform Bill

    Florida Construction Defect Decision Part of Lengthy Evolution

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Named to Hudson Valley Magazine’s 2022 Top Lawyers List

    Employer’s Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    Celebrating Excellence: Lisa Bondy Dunn named by Law Week Colorado as the 2024 Barrister’s Best Construction Defects Lawyer for Defendants

    Trump Order Waives Project Environment Rules to Push COVID-19 Recovery

    Construction’s AI Moment — Why Contractors Are Increasingly Optimistic

    Legal Battle Kicks Off to Minimize Baltimore Bridge Liabilities

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured In Northern California Super Lawyers 2021!

    Supreme Court of New Jersey Reviews Statutes of Limitation and the Discovery Rule in Construction Defect Cases

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    Miami's Condo Craze Burns Out on Strong Dollar

    Solicitor General’s Views to Supreme Court on Two Circuit Court Rulings that Groundwater Can be Considered “Waters of the United States”

    Keeping KeyArena's Landmark Lid Overhead at Climate Pledge Arena Redevelopment Is A 22,000-Ton Balancing Act

    Predicting the Future of Texas’s Grid Is a Texas-Sized Challenge

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    Under New York Law a Recourse Provision Bars Most Claims Except for Fraud

    Carwash Prosecutors Seek $1.6 Billion From Brazil Builders

    ACS Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Recognized

    How a Maryland County Created the Gold Standard for Building Emissions Reduction

    San Francisco OKs Revamped Settling Millennium Tower Fix

    "Occurrence" May Include Intentional Acts In Montana

    Design & Construction Case Expands Florida’s Slavin Doctrine

    Timely and Properly Assert Affirmative Defenses and Understand Statutory Conditions Precedent

    Fire Consultants Cannot Base Opinions on Speculation

    Implied Warranties for Infrastructure in Florida Construction Defect Claims

    Let’s Give ‘Em Sutton to Talk About: Tennessee Court Enforces Sutton Doctrine

    Court Affirms Summary Adjudication of Bad Faith Claim Where Expert Opinions Raised a Genuine Dispute

    Tips for Contractors Who Want to Help Rebuild After the California Wildfires

    Don’t Fall in Trap of Buying the Cheapest Insurance Policy as it May be Bad for Your Business Risks and Needs

    Don’t Let Construction Problems Become Construction Disputes (guest post)

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: RACHEL CLANCY

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives “Tier 1” Ranking by U.S. News and World Reports

    California Poised for the Most Significant Residential Construction Defect Reforms in Decades

    Atlanta Office Wins Defense Verdict For Property Manager On Claims By Vendor, Cross-Claims By Property Owner

    Contractor Succeeds At the Supreme Court Against Public Owner – Obtaining Fee Award and Determination The City Acted In Bad Faith

    Montana Federal Court Holds that an Interior Department’s Federal Advisory Committee Was Improperly Reestablished

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Emotional Distress Damages Not Distinct from “Annoyance and Discomfort” Damages in Case Arising from 2007 California Wildfires

    Daily Construction Reports: Don’t Leave the Job Without Them

    No Coverage For Construction Defect Under Illinois Law
    Corporate Profile

    UNION COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Union County, South Carolina Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Union County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Union County, South Carolina

    Urban Digital Twins: How Virtual Cities Could Help Build Smarter Cities

    August 11, 2026 —
    Traffic congestion, endless construction, flooded streets and power outages. For city leaders and residents alike, these disruptions are simply part of daily urban life. But an emerging tool, known as the urban digital twin, could help cities anticipate problems before they occur by allowing planners to simulate responses, stress-test infrastructure, and evaluate decisions before implementing them in the real world. What Is an Urban Digital Twin? An urban digital twin is a dynamic, data-driven virtual model of a real city. It uses AI analytics and combines 3D modeling with real-time data and information from sources such as IoT sensors, traffic cameras, satellite feeds, infrastructure databases, utility networks, and environmental data including weather systems and heat maps to create a continuously updated digital representation of the urban environment that mirrors infrastructure, movement and systems in real time. In other words, it is a living digital replica of a city. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury

    Construction Contract Negotiation & Drafting: A Practical Checklist (and Where State-Specific Issues Can Surprise You)

    April 20, 2026 —
    Construction contract negotiation is often treated as a “forms exercise,” especially when the parties start from familiar templates (e.g., AIA forms). In practice, though, the biggest problems tend to arise not from the existence of a form, but from (i) misalignment among the project’s governing documents and participants, (ii) ambiguity in pricing and payment mechanics, and (iii) state-specific statutory requirements that override negotiated terms. This article includes a practical checklist intended to help owners, developers, and contractors streamline contract negotiations, reduce downstream disputes, and avoid unpleasant surprises during payment administration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michelle Cooper, Sheppard
    Ms. Cooper may be contacted at mcooper@sheppard.com

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Water Reuse Emerges as a Critical Strategy for Data Center Development

    June 22, 2026 —
    As demand for data centers continues to accelerate, water availability is emerging as a critical factor in project development and long-term operations. Although power supply and transmission access have historically dominated siting discussions, increasing water constraints in many regions are placing greater focus on the substantial volumes of water required to support data center cooling systems. As we covered previously, data centers are frequently located in areas already experiencing water stress and require substantial volumes of water to operate—roughly 228 billion gallons in 2023 in the United States alone—with water use projected to increase by up to 170% by 2030. Alternative cooling options, such as free-air cooling or mechanical chillers, can reduce direct water consumption but introduce their own tradeoffs. Free-air cooling is climate-dependent and often ineffective in hotter regions, while mechanical chillers increase energy demand, potentially shifting water consumption upstream through increased electricity generation. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Supply Chain Is a Legal Exposure—Not Just a Force Majeure Problem

    September 08, 2026 —
    This is not another force majeure article. The supply-chain related legal exposure that contractors are carrying today—in sanctions risk, specification non-compliance, warranty exposure and regulatory volatility—extends well beyond what even a well-drafted force majeure clause protects. An engineering, procurement and construction contractor on a gas-fired power plant discovers during commissioning that transformer oil in a critical unit contains Russian-origin naphthenic base oil, which is a prohibited source under Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. The contractor didn’t source it. A subsupplier two tiers below made the substitution when disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz tightened the primary supply chain for this specialty product and no one in the purchase-order chain flagged it. The procurement decision is long done and the documentation trail that should have caught it doesn’t exist. Reprinted courtesy of Owen Newman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Newman may be contacted at oknewman@duanemorris.com