BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Stokes County North Carolina custom home expert witness Stokes County North Carolina office building expert witness Stokes County North Carolina hospital construction expert witness Stokes County North Carolina parking structure expert witness Stokes County North Carolina Medical building expert witness Stokes County North Carolina production housing expert witness Stokes County North Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Stokes County North Carolina condominiums expert witness Stokes County North Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Stokes County North Carolina tract home expert witness Stokes County North Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Stokes County North Carolina housing expert witness Stokes County North Carolina condominium expert witness Stokes County North Carolina institutional building expert witness Stokes County North Carolina retail construction expert witness Stokes County North Carolina casino resort expert witness Stokes County North Carolina industrial building expert witness Stokes County North Carolina low-income housing expert witness Stokes County North Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Stokes County North Carolina townhome construction expert witness Stokes County North Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Stokes County North Carolina
    Stokes County North Carolina engineering consultantStokes County North Carolina expert witness commercial buildingsStokes County North Carolina ada design expert witnessStokes County North Carolina construction expertsStokes County North Carolina stucco expert witnessStokes County North Carolina structural concrete expertStokes County North Carolina construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Stokes County, North Carolina

    North Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Stokes County North Carolina

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $30,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Roanoke Valley Chapter
    Local # 3457
    PO Box 279
    Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
    Stokes County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Roanoke Valley Chapter
    Local # 3457
    PO Box 279
    Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
    Stokes County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Roxboro-Person Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 3464
    333 S Lamar Street
    Roxboro, NC 27573
    Stokes County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Roxboro-Person Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 3464
    333 S Lamar Street
    Roxboro, NC 27573
    Stokes County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Alleghany County Chapter
    Local # 3446
    PO Box 489
    Sparta, NC 28675

    Stokes County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Alleghany County Chapter
    Local # 3446
    PO Box 489
    Sparta, NC 28675

    Stokes County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Ashe County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3408
    PO Box 1450
    Jefferson, NC 28640

    Stokes County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Stokes County North Carolina


    California Courts Call a “Time Out” During COVID-19 –New Emergency Court Rules on Civil Litigation

    Connecticut Supreme Court Again Asked to Determine the Meaning of Collapse

    'Right to Repair' and Fixing Equipment in a Digital Age

    Designers Face Fatal Pedestrian Bridge Collapse Fallout

    Rental Assistance Program: Good News for Tenants and Possibly Landlords

    Claim Against Broker Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Bar to Raise on Green Standard

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Connecticut Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade

    Exploring Architects’ Perspectives on AI: A Survey of Fears and Hopes

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Offices and Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    Injury to Employees Endorsement Eliminates Coverage for Insured Employer

    Insurer Doomed in Delaware by the Sutton Rule

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    Court Holds That Parent Corporation Lacks Standing to Sue Subsidiary’s Insurers for Declaratory Relief

    Construction Jobs Keep Rising, with April Gain of 33,000

    High Court Case Review Frees Jailed Buffalo Billions Contractor CEO

    Florida High-Rise for Sale, Construction Defects Possibly Included

    California Supreme Court Endorses City Authority to Adopt Inclusionary Housing Ordinance

    Parol Evidence can be Used to Defeat Fraudulent Lien

    Housing Isn’t Expensive for Everyone

    First Trump Agenda Nuggets Hit Construction

    Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of Owner’s Claims Based on Contractual One-Year Claims Limitations Period

    Project-Specific Policies and Products-Completed Operations Hazard Extensions

    Failure to Strictly Adhere to Limitations for Flood Claim Leads to Denial

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    Yet ANOTHER Reminder to Always Respond

    MTA’S New Debarment Powers Pose an Existential Risk

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    Idaho Supreme Court Address Water Exclusion in Commercial Property Exclusion

    South Adams County Water and Sanitation District Takes Proactive Step to Treat PFAS, Safeguard Water Supplies

    An Architect Uses AI to Explore Surreal Black Worlds

    The Right to Repair Act Means What it Says and Says What it Means

    Miller Act Claim for Unsigned Change Orders

    Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site

    Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe.

    OSHA Fines Alabama Contractor After Site Manager Electrocuted

    Google’s Floating Mystery Boxes Solved?

    Replacement of Gym Floor Due to Sloppy Paint Job is Not Resulting Loss

    Sweat the Small Stuff – Don’t Overlook These Three (3) Clauses When Negotiating Your Construction Contract

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized as Super Lawyers

    Texas Restricts Foreign Ownership of Real Property

    The Fair Share Act Impacts the Strategic Planning of a Jury Trial

    Do Not Lose Your Mechanics Lien Right Through a Subordination Agreement

    Federal Judge Dismisses Insurance Coverage Lawsuit In Construction Defect Case

    Changes to Va. Code Section 43-13: Another Arrow in a Subcontractor’s Quiver

    Tesla Finishes First Solar Roofs—Including Elon's House

    Florida Courts Inundated by Wave of New Lawsuits as Sweeping Tort Reform Appears Imminent

    BHA Sponsors the 9th Annual Construction Law Institute
    Corporate Profile

    STOKES COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Stokes County, North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Stokes County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Stokes County, North Carolina

    Modern Building-Sundt $17M Claim Is Stranded by Hospital Bankruptcy

    April 27, 2026 —
    A $16.9-million claim for work on a hospital addition by a joint venture of contractors Modern Building Co. and Sundt Construction is stuck and delayed indefinitely following the California hospital's December bankruptcy filing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Midwest Team Secures Resolution of Matter for Homeowners’ Association Client, Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees

    February 10, 2026 —
    Kansas City/Wichita Partner Alan L. Rupe and Kansas City Associate Delaney McCoy recently achieved a victory on behalf of their client, a homeowners’ association that was sued after denying a solar panel application. The plaintiff homeowners challenged the association’s decision in court, and after extensive—and costly—litigation, the court ultimately determined that the dispute was not yet ripe for judicial review. With that threshold issue resolved, the parties were able to work collaboratively to address the solar panel matter itself. But one significant question remained: whether the association was entitled to recover its legal fees under the declaration, despite the American Rule, which generally requires each party to bear its own costs. The client felt understandably taken advantage of because this issue could—and should—have been resolved without litigation. Considerable time and resources were diverted from the community for the advantage of a single household, so the Lewis Brisbois team continued to advocate for the association’s contractual right to recover fees. After oral argument, the Court agreed, enforcing the fee‑shifting provisions in the governing documents and ruling in favor of the homeowners’ association. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    New Survey Reveals Overwhelmingly Optimistic Results on the Use of AI in Construction

    May 14, 2026 —
    On December 5, 2025, CMiC and Dodge released a survey asking over 6,000 companies across various sectors of the construction industry their stance on artificial intelligence—whether they use it or not; whether they like it or not; whether they have or are planning to implement it or not; and so on. Considering its reputation for skepticism and reluctance when it comes to adopting new forms of technology, the construction industry pleasantly surprised CMiC and Dodge with its answers to these questions, with 87% of contractors believing AI will have a meaningful impact on construction. “The research indicates the construction industry is nearing a tipping point for AI adoption,” says Steve Jones, senior director of industry insights at Dodge Construction Network, who sat down with Construction Executive to delve further into the survey questions and answers and what the industry’s current position on them means for AI’s future role in construction. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Buffalo, NY Stadium Work Resumes After Suspects ID'ed in $150K Graffiti Vandalism

    March 17, 2026 —
    Construction work is back on track at Highmark Stadium in Orchard Park, N.Y., after police identifed, but did not arrest two suspects in connection with $150,000 in property damage that paused work for nearly one week at the $2.1 billion stadium project, said the Gilbane Building Cos. and Turner Construction joint venture building it for the National Football League’s Buffalo Bills. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Emell D. Adolphus, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Adolphus may be contacted at adolphuse@enr.com