BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Sheridan County Montana tract home expert witness Sheridan County Montana custom homes expert witness Sheridan County Montana industrial building expert witness Sheridan County Montana Medical building expert witness Sheridan County Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Sheridan County Montana parking structure expert witness Sheridan County Montana townhome construction expert witness Sheridan County Montana housing expert witness Sheridan County Montana low-income housing expert witness Sheridan County Montana custom home expert witness Sheridan County Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Sheridan County Montana condominium expert witness Sheridan County Montana production housing expert witness Sheridan County Montana retail construction expert witness Sheridan County Montana office building expert witness Sheridan County Montana casino resort expert witness Sheridan County Montana landscaping construction expert witness Sheridan County Montana high-rise construction expert witness Sheridan County Montana hospital construction expert witness Sheridan County Montana condominiums expert witness Sheridan County Montana multi family housing expert witness Sheridan County Montana
    Sheridan County Montana structural engineering expert witnessesSheridan County Montana roofing and waterproofing expert witnessSheridan County Montana testifying construction expert witnessSheridan County Montana consulting general contractorSheridan County Montana window expert witnessSheridan County Montana eifs expert witnessSheridan County Montana construction experts
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sheridan County, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sheridan County Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flathead Building Assoc.
    Local # 2790
    21 W Reserve Dr
    Kalispell, MT 59901

    Sheridan County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Flathead Building Assoc.
    Local # 2790
    21 W Reserve Dr
    Kalispell, MT 59901

    Sheridan County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Great Falls
    Local # 2744
    600 6th St NW Ste 5
    Great Falls, MT 59404
    Sheridan County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Great Falls
    Local # 2744
    600 6th St NW Ste 5
    Great Falls, MT 59404
    Sheridan County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Missoula Building Industry Association
    Local # 2788
    1840 S Ave W
    Missoula, MT 59801

    Sheridan County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Missoula Building Industry Association
    Local # 2788
    1840 S Ave W
    Missoula, MT 59801

    Sheridan County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602

    Sheridan County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sheridan County Montana


    New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Imposes Increased Disclosure Requirements On Defendants at the Beginning of Lawsuits

    Another Colorado City Passes Construction Defects Ordinance

    No Cross-Complaint Needed - Court of Appeal Clarifies Co-Defendants May Oppose Each Other’s Summary Judgment Motions Without a Cross-Complaint

    S&P Near $1 Billion Mortgage Ratings Settlement With U.S.

    I.M. Pei, Architect Who Designed Louvre Pyramid, Dies at 102

    Fungi, Wet Rot, Dry Rot and "Virus": One of These Things is Not Like the Other

    Employees Versus Independent Contractors

    The Economic Loss Rule and Tort Claims by Owners against Design Professionals

    Corps Issues Draft EIS for Controversial Alaskan Copper Mine

    Contractor Haunted by “Demonized” Flooring

    Can You Really Be Liable For a Product You Didn’t Make? In New Jersey, the Answer is Yes

    Will European Insurers’ Positive Response to COVID-19 Claims Influence US Insurers?

    The Dominguez Case and Deed Fraud: Who Criminals Target and How to Protect Yourself Against Fraud

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2020

    Defects in Texas High School Stadium Angers Residents

    ¡AI Caramba!

    Pre-Judgment Interest Not Awarded Under Flood Policy

    Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court

    California’s SB 61: New Limits on Retention Payments in Private Construction Contracts

    Scary Movie: Theatre Developer Axed By Court of Appeal In Prevailing Wage Determination Challenge

    A Sample Itinerary to get the Most out of West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar

    Immigrants' Legal Status Eyed Over Roles in New York Fake Injury Lawsuits

    Contractor Entitled to Continued Defense Against Allegations of Faulty Construction

    OSHA Begins Enforcement of its Respirable Crystalline Silica in Construction Standard. Try Saying That Five Times Real Fast

    Ritzy NYC Tower Developer Says Residents’ Lawsuit ‘Ill-Advised’

    Hundreds of Snakes Discovered in Santa Ana Home

    Former Zurich Executive to Head Willis North America Construction Insurance Group

    Skipping Depositions does not Constitute Failure to Cooperate in New York

    New York Considers Amendments to Construction Industry Wage Laws that Would Impose Significant Burden Upon Contractors

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Court of Appeals Expands Application of Construction Statute of Repose

    Homeowner Sues Brick Manufacturer for Spalling Bricks

    A Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?

    Governmental Action Exclusion Bars Claim for Damage to Insured's Building

    Mind Those Deadlines! Party Loses Appeal of Arbitration Decision by Failing to Timely File a Petition to Vacate

    “Professional Best Efforts” part 2– Reservation of Rights for Engineers who agree to “best” efforts? (law note)

    Balancing Cybersecurity Threats in Smart Cities: Is the Potential Convenience of “Smart” Intersections Worth the Risk?

    Colorado’s Federal District Court Finds Carriers Have Joint and Several Defense Duties

    Liability Insurer Precluded from Intervening in Insured’s Lawsuit

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a C-. It’s an Improvement Though

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (11/12/25) – Banks Weather CRE Storm, Industrial Outdoor Storage Markets Soar, and Office Vacancy Decline

    Colorado House Bill 20-1290 – Restriction on the Use of Failure to Cooperate Defense in First-Party Claims

    How Are You Dealing with Material Delays / Supply Chain Impacts?

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2020 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Is Your Business Insured for the Coronavirus?

    Speak Now or Forever Sign That Release – Part 1

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (11/03/21)

    Balfour Taps Qinetiq’s Quinn as new CEO to Revamp Builder

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Considerations for Optimizing Dispute Resolution Clauses
    Corporate Profile

    SHERIDAN COUNTY MONTANA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Sheridan County, Montana Roofing Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Sheridan County, Montana

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    June 29, 2026 —
    The Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Building More Than a Ramp: HHMR and the Home Builders Foundation

    September 15, 2026 —
    Last Friday, four members of the Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell team traded briefs, depositions, and construction litigation files for lumber, drills, and a day on a jobsite. HHMR attorneys Ricky Nolen, Amanda Tynan, Kyle Thompson, and Tanner Davis participated in the Home Builders Foundation’s 2026 Blitz Build, helping construct an accessibility ramp for Andrea, a Denver-area resident whose mobility challenges had made something most of us take for granted extraordinarily difficult: leaving her own home independently. The day after the build, the volunteers received an e-mail from HBF’s Terrina Reiber with an unusual request: set an alarm for 10:00 the next morning. At 10:00 on a Saturday, she explained, they might be running errands, meeting a friend, or simply deciding what to do with the day. When the alarm went off, she asked them to think about Andrea. Because Andrea could now make that same choice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    September 08, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that four Partners have been selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. In addition, six attorneys have been included in the 2027 Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch list. These recognitions include attorneys from the firm’s White Plains, NY; Chicago, IL; Palm Beach Gardens, FL; and St. Petersburg, FL offices. 2027 Best Lawyers® White Plains, NY
    • Lisa L. Shrewsberry – Commercial Litigation
    Chicago, IL
    • Brian C. Bassett – Insurance Law
    Palm Beach Gardens, FL
    • Rina Clemens – Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants
    St. Petersburg, FL
    • Lauren S. Curtis – Insurance Law
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    August 03, 2026 —
    It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Water Reuse Emerges as a Critical Strategy for Data Center Development

    June 22, 2026 —
    As demand for data centers continues to accelerate, water availability is emerging as a critical factor in project development and long-term operations. Although power supply and transmission access have historically dominated siting discussions, increasing water constraints in many regions are placing greater focus on the substantial volumes of water required to support data center cooling systems. As we covered previously, data centers are frequently located in areas already experiencing water stress and require substantial volumes of water to operate—roughly 228 billion gallons in 2023 in the United States alone—with water use projected to increase by up to 170% by 2030. Alternative cooling options, such as free-air cooling or mechanical chillers, can reduce direct water consumption but introduce their own tradeoffs. Free-air cooling is climate-dependent and often ineffective in hotter regions, while mechanical chillers increase energy demand, potentially shifting water consumption upstream through increased electricity generation. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...