BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Rock County Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Rock County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Rock County Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Rock County Wisconsin production housing expert witness Rock County Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Rock County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Rock County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Rock County Wisconsin housing expert witness Rock County Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Rock County Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Rock County Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Rock County Wisconsin custom home expert witness Rock County Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Rock County Wisconsin office building expert witness Rock County Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Rock County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Rock County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Rock County Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Rock County Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Rock County Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Rock County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Rock County Wisconsin
    Rock County Wisconsin building expertRock County Wisconsin eifs expert witnessRock County Wisconsin construction project management expert witnessesRock County Wisconsin delay claim expert witnessRock County Wisconsin building code expert witnessRock County Wisconsin expert witness roofingRock County Wisconsin defective construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Rock County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Rock County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    South West Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5142
    703 19th St PO Box 521
    Monroe, WI 53566
    Rock County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South West Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5142
    703 19th St PO Box 521
    Monroe, WI 53566
    Rock County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Central Wisconsin Builders Association
    Local # 5140
    PO Box 563
    Janesville, WI 53547

    Rock County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Central Wisconsin Builders Association
    Local # 5140
    PO Box 563
    Janesville, WI 53547

    Rock County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Racine-Kenosha Builders Association
    Local # 5156
    PO Box 706
    Sturtevant, WI 53177

    Rock County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Racine-Kenosha Builders Association
    Local # 5156
    PO Box 706
    Sturtevant, WI 53177

    Rock County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lakeland Builders Association
    Local # 5128
    1560 N Country Club Pkwy
    Elkhorn, WI 53121

    Rock County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Rock County Wisconsin


    Engineering Report Finds More Investigation Needed of Balconies at New Jersey Condo

    PSA: New COVID Vaccine ETS Issued by OSHA

    Noteworthy Construction Defect Cases for 1st Qtr 2014

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Returns as a Sponsor at the 30th Annual Construction Law Conference in San Antonio

    Free Texas MCLE Seminar at BHA Houston June 13th

    Women in Construction Aren’t Silent Anymore. They Are Using TikTok to Battle Discrimination

    Compliance with Contractual and Jurisdictional Pre-Suit Requirements is Essential to Maximizing Recovery

    Certifying Claim Under Contract Disputes Act

    City of Birmingham Countersues Contractor for Incomplete Work

    Happy New Year from CDJ

    The “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect Reforms

    Toolbox Talk Series: GenAI Document Review

    Blackstone Said in $1.7 Billion Deal to Buy Apartments

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Who Needs Them”

    CalOSHA Updates its FAQ on its COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Regulations

    Court Holds That Public Entity Can Unilaterally Replace Subcontractor Under California’s Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act

    How to Fix America

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    Auburn Woods Homeowners Association v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    Balancing Tradition and Technology in Bringing AI to AEC

    Res Judicata Not Apply to Bar Overlapping Damages in Separate Suits Against Contractor and Subcontractor

    Insureds Prevail on Summary Judgment Addressing Responsibility for Water Leak

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    Contract Change #9: Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work (law note)

    Final Thoughts on New Pay If Paid Legislation in VA

    Allegations of Actual Property Damage Necessary to Invoke Duty to Defend

    Court Orders House to be Demolished or Relocated

    A Game of Texas Hold’em: How Texas Stopped Wage Increases for Salaried Exempt Employees Nationwide

    Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement

    Texas Supreme Court Defines ‘Plaintiff’ in 3rd-Party Claims Against Design Professionals

    White and Williams Celebrates 125th Anniversary

    Out of the Black

    CDJ’s #4 Topic of the Year: KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County

    Construction Costs Absorb Two Big Hits This Quarter

    Government Claims Act Does Not Apply to Actions Solely Seeking Declaratory Relief and Not Monetary Relief

    Showdown Over Landmark Housing Law Looms at U.S. Supreme Court

    Float-In of MassDOT Span Sails, But Delay Dispute Lingers

    Virginia Allows Condominium Association’s Insurer to Subrogate Against a Condominium Tenant

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Imposes Increased Disclosure Requirements On Defendants at the Beginning of Lawsuits

    A Discussion on Home Affordability

    What Startup Funding Reveals About the Future of Construction Technology

    Surety's Settlement Without Principal's Consent Is Not Bad Faith

    What to do about California’s Defect-Ridden Board of Equalization Building

    Newmeyer & Dillion Appoints Partner Carol Zaist as General Counsel

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Governor Murphy Approves Legislation Implementing Public-Private Partnerships in New Jersey

    MTA Debarment Update

    Cal/OSHA-Approved Changes to ETS Will Take Effect May 6, 2022

    Sometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .
    Corporate Profile

    ROCK COUNTY WISCONSIN ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Rock County, Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Rock County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Rock County, Wisconsin

    Limitations of Liability Provisions in Construction Contracts: A Means to Manage Risk and Limit Financial Exposure

    June 23, 2026 —
    Taking a cue from architects and engineers, construction contractors have started inserting limitation of liability clauses in their construction contracts to manage risk and limit financial exposure. This article will address the specific risks that can be limited through an LOL, tips for negotiating the LOL terms with reluctant owners to cover those specific risks, how to limit unintended consequences of an LOL (such as relieving an insurer of its obligations to cover certain losses), and approaches to setting the amount of the liability cap in the LOL. Addressing Particular Risks An LOL can address a wide range of risks, including:
    • Damages for delay
    • Liability for non-conforming or defective work
    • Liability for third-party bodily injury or property damage
    • Liability excluded by a general liability policy (e.g., pollution and cyber liability)
    • Liability related to intellectual property
    Reprinted courtesy of Ellen Chapelle, Richard Reizen, Hannah Batsche, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    March 03, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Feb. 20, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, Sharon Oh-Kubisch, and Manuel Ugarte were selected to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers® list. Jason Feld is a founding partner of Kahana Feld. He focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    July 06, 2026 —
    When purchasing a home from a homebuilder, there is an important consideration when it comes to the limited warranty you receive around the time you close on the home. That limited warranty likely includes an arbitration provision requiring you to arbitrate your disputes, such as construction defect claims, against the homebuilder. That arbitration provision will most likely include all claims, including statutory claims (such as a statutory violation of a building code claim), requiring you to arbitrate, as opposed to litigate, your disputes against the homebuilder. This is an important consideration. If the arbitration provision does not allow you to arbitrate all of your claims, and eliminates your rights to legitimate statutory claims, the arbitration provision could be unenforceable. By way of example, in a residential construction defect dispute, Anderson v. Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., 223 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), the appeal turned on whether the arbitration provision in the homebuilder’s limited warranty was valid. The homeowners took possession of their home in 2009. In 2015, the homeowners served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects that included a statutory violation of a building code claim under Florida Statute §553.84. The limited warranty included an arbitration provision that specified it was the “exclusive remedy” for all disputes arising out of or related to the warranty or issues with the home and property. When read together with the warranty’s disclaimer that precluded claims not covered by the warranty “whether in contract, tort, or otherwise,” the statutory building code violation claim could not be remedied through arbitration because it fell outside the warranty’s coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    March 10, 2026 —
    “We do not follow maps to buried treasure, and X never, ever marks the spot.” That’s the advice that Indiana Jones offered in the Last Crusade film. But what’s beneath the surface isn’t just important to adventure archaeologists. It has real-world application to our industry, where success depends on the stability of materials below the surface. The study of geology and soils has ancient roots. Egyptians relied on soil stability for the pyramids; Rome built a continent-wide roadway system utilizing subgrade preparation techniques; Medieval builders implemented a rudimentary foundation pier system; Henri Gautier studied what is now called the “angle of repose” for French retaining walls in the early 18th Century. Through the 19th Century, contractors bore the risk of the stability of their work, and the attendant peril of unforeseen site conditions. But in the early 20th Century, design trades continued to develop increased understanding of soil and underground conditions. In the 1920’s US federal contracts began employing “differing site conditions” clauses, which provided for cost/time adjustments if subsurface conditions differed from expectations. Industry forms followed the federal policy, and these clauses became almost universally accepted. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Lee Banta, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Banta may be contacted at lbanta@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    WSHB Managing Partner Chad Dunigan Named Finalist for Jerrold S. Oliver "Ollie" Award of Excellence

    May 12, 2026 —
    Chad Dunigan, Managing Partner of Wood Smith Henning & Berman's Orlando, Florida, office, has been selected as one of just four finalists for the prestigious Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence, affectionately known in the construction defect community as the "Ollie" Award. This distinguished honor recognizes individuals who have made exceptional contributions and demonstrated unwavering dedication to advancing the field of construction defect law. Named in honor of the late Judge Jerrold S. Oliver, a revered founder of alternative dispute resolution in construction defect claims and litigation, the Ollie award symbolizes loyalty, commitment, and trust within the industry. Judge Oliver's legacy as a staunch believer in the resolution process continues to inspire professionals who strive for excellence in the construction defect community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wood Smith Henning Berman