BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Polk County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Polk County Wisconsin production housing expert witness Polk County Wisconsin office building expert witness Polk County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Polk County Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Polk County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Polk County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Polk County Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Polk County Wisconsin tract home expert witness Polk County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Polk County Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Polk County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Polk County Wisconsin housing expert witness Polk County Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Polk County Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Polk County Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Polk County Wisconsin condominium expert witness Polk County Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Polk County Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Polk County Wisconsin custom home expert witness Polk County Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Polk County Wisconsin
    Polk County Wisconsin building envelope expert witnessPolk County Wisconsin construction code expert witnessPolk County Wisconsin stucco expert witnessPolk County Wisconsin window expert witnessPolk County Wisconsin building consultant expertPolk County Wisconsin construction scheduling expert witnessPolk County Wisconsin architect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Polk County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Polk County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868

    Polk County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868

    Polk County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Polk County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Polk County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Polk County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Polk County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Polk County Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Polk County Wisconsin


    2024 Update to CEB’s Mechanics Liens Now Available

    Bankrupt Canada Contractor Execs Ordered to Repay $26 Million

    Hudson Tunnel Plan Shows Sign of Life as U.S. Speeds Review

    Huh? Action on Construction Lien “Relates Back” Despite Notice of Contest of Lien

    Reminder: Always Order a Title Search for Your Mechanic’s Lien

    Waive Not, Want Not: Waivers and Releases on California Construction Projects

    Duty to Defend Bodily Injury Evolving Over Many Policy Periods Prorated in Louisiana

    Unlocking the Hidden Power of Zoning, for Good or Bad

    DOE Abruptly Cancels $13B Cleanup Award to BWXT-Fluor Team

    Las Vegas Student Housing Developer Will Name Replacement Contractor

    Maui Wildfire Cleanup Could Cost $1B and Take One Year

    KY Mining Accident Not a Covered Occurrence Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Is Your Website Accessible And Are You Liable If It Isn't?

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    Retaining Wall Contractor Not Responsible for Building Damage

    Shiloh and Vallejo: The DOI Tale of Two Properties

    Legal Disputes Soar as Poor Information Management Impacts the AEC Industry

    #7 CDJ Topic: Truck Ins. Exchange v. O'Mailia

    Lithium for Batteries from Geothermal Brine

    Kadeejah Kelly Named to The National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List

    Workarounds for Workers' Comp Immunity: How to Obtain Additional Insured Coverage when the Named Insured is Immune from Suit

    Congress Considers Pandemic Risk Insurance Act to Address COVID-19 Business Interruptions Losses

    City of Seattle Temporarily Shuts Down Public Works to Enforce Health and Safety Plans

    Negligence Claim Not Barred by Gist of the Action Doctrine

    Personal Thoughts on Construction Mediation

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Best Practices for Productive Rule 26(f) Conferences on Discovery Plans

    The 2025 Legal Horizon for U.S. Offshore Wind

    The Problem with One Year Warranties

    Navigating the New Frontier of Federal-State Energy Regulation: What Energy Companies Need to Know

    Renters Trading Size for Frills Fuel U.S. Apartment Boom

    Indiana Court of Appeals Holds That Lease Terms Bar Landlord’s Carrier From Subrogating Against Commercial Tenant

    AIA Releases State-Specific Waiver and Release Forms

    Automating Your Home? There’s an App for That

    Are You Overpromising on Your Construction Contracts? Here's How to Build With Transparency

    Pulled from the Swamp: EPA Wetland Determination Now Judicially Reviewable

    New York Revises Retainage Requirements for Private Construction Contracts: Overview of the “5% Retainage Law”

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/17/24) – Housing Inflation to Remain High, Proptech Investment to Fall and Office Vacancy Rates to Reach Peak in 2025

    The Job is Substantially Complete, the Subcontract was Never Signed, the Subcontractor Wants to be Paid—Now What?

    Motion to Strike Insurer's Expert Opinion Granted

    Replacing Coal Plants with Renewables Is Cheaper 80% of the Time

    The Overlooked Nevada Rule In an Arena Project Lawsuit

    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Part I: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts

    Digital Twins – Interview with Cristina Savian

    Is Your Design Professional Construction Contract too Friendly? (Law Note)

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    San Francisco International Airport Reaches New Heights in Sustainable Project Delivery

    Panthers Withdraw City, County Deal Over Abandoned Facility

    Harmon Towers Demolition Still Uncertain
    Corporate Profile

    POLK COUNTY WISCONSIN ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Polk County, Wisconsin Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Polk County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Polk County, Wisconsin

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    July 06, 2026 —
    In 2007, New York City’s sanitation department threatened Natalie Shea with a $300 fine for defacing public property with graffiti. Her crime: drawing a blue flower in front of her family’s Park Slope home with sidewalk chalk. She was six years old. The incident, which made local and national news at the time, captures the fraught role that sidewalks often play in US cities. These patches of pavement do more than carry pedestrians to their destinations: They’re also places for commerce, social interaction and childhood play, from chalking to learning how to ride a bike. Urbanist Jane Jacobs once likened the range of activities that city sidewalks attract to an “intricate ballet.” In the new book Sidewalk Nation: The Life and Law of America’s Most Overlooked Resource (Harvard University Press), author Michael Pollack explores the “tangled web of state and local regulation” that governs sidewalks, with cities often passing along responsibilities for tasks like clearing snow and keeping walkways safe. He paints a portrait of the American sidewalk a disorderly and often neglected network, filled with literal and metaphorical cracks that give rise to all sorts of conflict, from mundane clashes over maintenance to more consequential fights over accessibility and inequality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    Limitations of Liability Provisions in Construction Contracts: A Means to Manage Risk and Limit Financial Exposure

    June 23, 2026 —
    Taking a cue from architects and engineers, construction contractors have started inserting limitation of liability clauses in their construction contracts to manage risk and limit financial exposure. This article will address the specific risks that can be limited through an LOL, tips for negotiating the LOL terms with reluctant owners to cover those specific risks, how to limit unintended consequences of an LOL (such as relieving an insurer of its obligations to cover certain losses), and approaches to setting the amount of the liability cap in the LOL. Addressing Particular Risks An LOL can address a wide range of risks, including:
    • Damages for delay
    • Liability for non-conforming or defective work
    • Liability for third-party bodily injury or property damage
    • Liability excluded by a general liability policy (e.g., pollution and cyber liability)
    • Liability related to intellectual property
    Reprinted courtesy of Ellen Chapelle, Richard Reizen, Hannah Batsche, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional

    April 27, 2026 —
    To deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate. The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy) In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Five Partners 'Lawyers of the Year'

    September 08, 2026 —
    Best Lawyers has selected 207 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 45 offices for its 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized five Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Partner John R. Conley (Product Liability Litigation - Defendants); Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law; Tax Law; Trusts and Estates); Weirton Managing Partner Michelle L. Gorman (Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants); Portland Partner Megan Cook (Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants); and San Diego Partner Craig T. Mann (Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants). Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can also see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Rogue AI — Is Your Company Prepared?

    September 28, 2026 —
    The recent wave of "rogue AI" incidents should be a wake-up call for every business leader and risk manager paying attention. Recent accounts document a sobering reality: AI systems from multiple leading AI developers have each escaped controlled testing environments and caused real-world harm—compromising outside infrastructure, exploiting third-party vulnerabilities, and even canceling another person's reservation to help a user jump a waitlist. These aren't hypotheticals from a sci-fi movie. They happened this summer. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.