BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Phelps County Nebraska production housing expert witness Phelps County Nebraska condominiums expert witness Phelps County Nebraska mid-rise construction expert witness Phelps County Nebraska multi family housing expert witness Phelps County Nebraska parking structure expert witness Phelps County Nebraska housing expert witness Phelps County Nebraska townhome construction expert witness Phelps County Nebraska tract home expert witness Phelps County Nebraska Subterranean parking expert witness Phelps County Nebraska custom homes expert witness Phelps County Nebraska custom home expert witness Phelps County Nebraska office building expert witness Phelps County Nebraska structural steel construction expert witness Phelps County Nebraska Medical building expert witness Phelps County Nebraska concrete tilt-up expert witness Phelps County Nebraska industrial building expert witness Phelps County Nebraska condominium expert witness Phelps County Nebraska high-rise construction expert witness Phelps County Nebraska landscaping construction expert witness Phelps County Nebraska institutional building expert witness Phelps County Nebraska hospital construction expert witness Phelps County Nebraska
    Phelps County Nebraska architectural expert witnessPhelps County Nebraska testifying construction expert witnessPhelps County Nebraska architecture expert witnessPhelps County Nebraska stucco expert witnessPhelps County Nebraska reconstruction expert witnessPhelps County Nebraska expert witness structural engineerPhelps County Nebraska structural engineering expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Phelps County, Nebraska

    Nebraska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Actions alleging a breach of warranty and construction defect are governed by a four-year statute of limitations (which may be extended by two years if the cause of action is not or could not reasonably have been discovered within the four-year period) and a ten-year statute of repose for latent defects.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Phelps County Nebraska

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting, however, local licensure is needed in counties with populations over 100,000. Licensure is required for the electrical trade.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Lincoln
    Local # 2836
    6100 S 58th St Ste C
    Lincoln, NE 68516

    Phelps County Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Lincoln
    Local # 2836
    6100 S 58th St Ste C
    Lincoln, NE 68516

    Phelps County Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2897
    5817 Ave O Place
    Kearney, NE 68847
    Phelps County Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2897
    5817 Ave O Place
    Kearney, NE 68847
    Phelps County Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Nebraska State Home Builders Association
    Local # 2800
    PO Box 22375
    Lincoln, NE 68542

    Phelps County Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Nebraska State Home Builders Association
    Local # 2800
    PO Box 22375
    Lincoln, NE 68542

    Phelps County Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2818
    131 North Grace
    Grand Island, NE 68803
    Phelps County Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Phelps County Nebraska


    Owner’s Obligation Giving Notice to Cure to Contractor and Analyzing Repair Protocol

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2024 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!!

    Indicted Union Representatives Try Again to Revive Enmons

    Discussion of the Discovery Rule and Tolling Statute of Limitations

    Court Rejects Anti-SLAPP Motion in Construction Defect Suit

    Apartment Boom in Denver a Shortcut Around Condo Construction Defect Suits?

    ACEC Statement on Negotiated Bipartisan Debt Limit Compromise

    Material Prices Climb…And Climb…Are You Considering A Material Escalation Provision?

    Guidance for Structural Fire Engineering Making Its Debut

    2019 Promotions - New Partners at Haight

    Washington First State to Require Electric Heat Pumps

    Drastic Rebuild Resurrects Graves' Landmark Portland Building

    How I Prevailed on a Remote Jury Trial

    Safeguarding History: Fire Risks in Renovating Historic Buildings

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denies Review of Pro-Policy Decision

    Dispute Waged Over Design of San Francisco Subway Job

    SEC Proposes Rule Requiring Public Firms to Report Climate Risks

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/08/23) – Buy and Sell With AI, Urban Real Estate Demand and Increasing Energy Costs

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    The Nightmare Scenario for Florida’s Coastal Homeowners

    #5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525

    Don’t Get Caught Holding the Bag: Hold the State Liable When General Contractor Fails to Pay on a Public Project

    How to Fireproof a Neighborhood

    Hawaii Federal District Court Rejects Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    How To Deal With Contractors Overcharging You – Bad Contractor Series Part 4

    Allegations That COVID-19 Was Physically Present and Altered Property are Sufficient to Sustain COVID-19 Business Interruption Suit

    A UK Bridge That Is a Lesson on How to Build Infrastructure

    Architects Should Not Make Initial Decisions on Construction Disputes

    Update Coverage for Construction Defect Claims in Colorado

    Cross-Office Team Secures Litigation Stay and Order of Arbitration on Behalf of Hotel Developer

    Disappointment on an Olympian Scale After Rio 2016 Summer Games

    Speeding up Infrastructure Projects with the Cloud

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Engineering, Architecture, and Modern Technology – An Interview with Dr. Jakob Strømann-Andersen

    Hawaii Supreme Court Paves the Way for Maui Fire Settlement to Proceed

    Failure to Strictly Adhere to Limitations for Flood Claim Leads to Denial

    No Friday Night Lights at $60 Million Texas Stadium: Muni Credit

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Client in Wrongful Death Lawsuit over Construction Incident

    Plans Go High Tech

    Res Judicata Not Apply to Bar Overlapping Damages in Separate Suits Against Contractor and Subcontractor

    New Index Tracking Mortgages for New Homes

    An Overview of the New EPA HVAC Refrigerant Regulations and Its Implications for the Construction Industry

    How Will Artificial Intelligence Impact Construction Litigation?

    Renters Who Bought Cannot Sue for Construction Defects

    Natural Hydrogen May Seem New in Town, but It’s Been Here All Along

    “Source of Duty,” Tort, and Contract, Oh My!

    You're Doing Construction in Russia, Now What?

    Solar and Wind Just Passed Another Big Turning Point

    Florida Governor Bans Foreign Citizens From Buying Land in Florida
    Corporate Profile

    PHELPS COUNTY NEBRASKA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Phelps County, Nebraska Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Phelps County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Phelps County, Nebraska

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    August 03, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026). Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Supply Chain Is a Legal Exposure—Not Just a Force Majeure Problem

    September 08, 2026 —
    This is not another force majeure article. The supply-chain related legal exposure that contractors are carrying today—in sanctions risk, specification non-compliance, warranty exposure and regulatory volatility—extends well beyond what even a well-drafted force majeure clause protects. An engineering, procurement and construction contractor on a gas-fired power plant discovers during commissioning that transformer oil in a critical unit contains Russian-origin naphthenic base oil, which is a prohibited source under Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. The contractor didn’t source it. A subsupplier two tiers below made the substitution when disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz tightened the primary supply chain for this specialty product and no one in the purchase-order chain flagged it. The procurement decision is long done and the documentation trail that should have caught it doesn’t exist. Reprinted courtesy of Owen Newman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Newman may be contacted at oknewman@duanemorris.com

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    August 24, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani is pleased to announce that 183 of its attorneys were listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2027 Edition, six of whom received “Lawyer of the Year” recognitions. Additionally, 49 GRSM attorneys were recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2027. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on peer-review evaluations. For the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®, results were determined using millions of confidential attorney evaluations. Ones to Watch adopts the same peer-review methodology. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    July 20, 2026 —
    A settlement agreement does not need to be executed for it to be enforceable as long as there was a MEETING OF THE MINDS. The same rings true for any contract regardless of whether the contract is signed – THERE NEEDS TO BE A MEETING OF THE MINDS. In a recent case dealing with the settlement agreement on a construction lien, the essential settlement terms (money and mutual release) were memorialized in an e-mail exchange between the parties (owner and subcontractor). The settlement required the owner to pay the principal amount plus some attorney’s fees and then a mutual general release would be prepared. In response to the confirmatory email, the owner sent a check, which the subcontractor deposited, but the owner refused to sign the release signed and sent by the subcontractor. The owner further claimed it doesn’t need to pay the attorney’s fees because the lien amount was paid in full. The subcontractor sued arguing the owner breached the terms of the settlement. The appellate court agreed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    August 24, 2026 —
    Last Thursday, researchers from Tampere and Aalto universities reported on preliminary results of two AI- and digitalization-related projects. One project demonstrated how AI can automate the Bill of Materials process; the other tried to quantify the impact of data-driven construction and AI. The conclusion was that AI-powered automation can dramatically increase productivity, but unevenly. However, the substantial benefits may come from better outcomes rather than project efficiency. Various standards, company-specific practices, project-specific schemas, and traditions are designed for humans to comprehend. 2D drawings and text documents as PDF files, Excel sheets, and design and planning software have the information, but not the data in ideal form for automation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices

    July 27, 2026 —
    Arbitration in construction disputes is a private process where owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers or suppliers present claims to one or more neutral arbitrators instead of taking the dispute through court. The arbitrator reviews evidence, hears testimony and issues a decision that is usually binding. Construction arbitration is common because project disputes are technical, document-heavy and time-sensitive. Claims may involve schedule delays, disputed change orders, defective work, differing site conditions, payment, termination, indemnity, surety issues or professional liability. Arbitration can be faster and more specialized than litigation, but speed is not guaranteed. Poor contract language, broad discovery, weak records and unclear damages can make arbitration expensive. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...