BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Nash County North Carolina custom home expert witness Nash County North Carolina low-income housing expert witness Nash County North Carolina custom homes expert witness Nash County North Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Nash County North Carolina condominiums expert witness Nash County North Carolina retail construction expert witness Nash County North Carolina hospital construction expert witness Nash County North Carolina condominium expert witness Nash County North Carolina multi family housing expert witness Nash County North Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Nash County North Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Nash County North Carolina housing expert witness Nash County North Carolina industrial building expert witness Nash County North Carolina tract home expert witness Nash County North Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Nash County North Carolina casino resort expert witness Nash County North Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Nash County North Carolina townhome construction expert witness Nash County North Carolina parking structure expert witness Nash County North Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Nash County North Carolina production housing expert witness Nash County North Carolina
    Nash County North Carolina defective construction expertNash County North Carolina construction safety expertNash County North Carolina architectural engineering expert witnessNash County North Carolina building consultant expertNash County North Carolina hospital construction expert witnessNash County North Carolina roofing construction expertNash County North Carolina ada design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Nash County, North Carolina

    North Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Nash County North Carolina

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $30,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of North Carolina
    Local # 3400
    PO Box 99090
    Raleigh, NC 27624

    Nash County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of North Carolina
    Local # 3400
    PO Box 99090
    Raleigh, NC 27624

    Nash County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Martin Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 3465
    14698 US Hwy 64
    Williamston, NC 27892

    Nash County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Martin Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 3465
    14698 US Hwy 64
    Williamston, NC 27892

    Nash County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Davidson County
    Local # 3427
    PO Box 498
    Lexington, NC 27293
    Nash County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Davidson County
    Local # 3427
    PO Box 498
    Lexington, NC 27293
    Nash County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Western Piedmont Home Builders Association
    Local # 3470
    PO Box 14
    Morganton, NC 28680
    Nash County North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Nash County North Carolina


    No Third-Quarter Gain for Construction

    10 Haight Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers in America© 2022 and The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2022

    Todd Ehrenreich Inducted as Fellow of International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle

    Washington Supreme Court Interprets Ensuing Loss Exception in All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    No Cross-Complaint Needed: Contractor Can Fight Co-Defendant’s Summary Judgment

    What If Your CCP 998 Offer is Silent on Costs?

    Three White and Williams Lawyers Named Top Lawyers by Delaware Today

    Notice of Claim Sufficient to Invoke Coverage

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 7: How to Successfully Prepare, Submit and Negotiate the Claim

    Choice of Laws Test Mandates Application of California’s Continuous and Progressive Trigger of Coverage to Asbestos Claims

    New 2021 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards Effective February 23, 2021

    COVID-19 Business Interruption Lawsuits Begin: Iconic Oceana Grill in New Orleans Files Insurance Coverage Lawsuit

    Fraud and Construction Contracts- Like Oil and Water?

    Baltimore Project Pushes To Meet Federal Deadline

    Boston Developer Sues Contractor Alleging Delays That Cost Millions

    Meet BWB&O’s 2025 Best Lawyers in America!

    Supreme Court Overrules Longstanding Decision Supporting Collection of Union Agency Fees

    Contractor Given a Wake-Up Call for Using a "Sham" RMO/RME

    City and Contractor Disclaim Responsibility for Construction Error that Lead to Blast

    Trade Contract Revisions to Address COVID-19

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    Damage to Plaintiffs' Home Caused By Unmoored Boats Survives Surface Water Exclusion

    Tech to Help Contractors Avoid Litigation

    The Benefits of Trash Talking: A Cautionary Tale of Demolition Gone Wrong

    Homebuilders See Record Bearish Bets on Shaky Recovery

    Motion for Summary Judgment Gets Pooped Upon

    Minnesota Addresses How Its Construction Statute of Repose Applies to Condominiums

    Maintenance Issues Ignite Arguments at Indiana School

    Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act Enacted

    Insurance Coverage Litigation Section to Present at Hawaii State Bar Convention

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: Dining

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    Grad Student Sues UC Santa Cruz over Mold in Residence

    Kahana Feld Partner Noelle Natoli Named President of Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles

    Gene Witkin Celebrates First Anniversary as Member of Ross Hart’s Mediation Team

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”

    Massachusetts Roofer Killed in Nine-story Fall

    Quanta Asks Judge to Block Award of $400M Long Island, NY Grid Contract to PSEG

    Housing in U.S. Cools as Rate Rise Hits Sales: Mortgages

    Update Your California Release Provisions to Include Amended Section 1542 Language

    Why Metro Atlanta Is the Poster Child for the US Housing Crisis

    Coverage For Advertising Injury Barred by Prior Publication Exclusion

    Anchoring Abuse: Evolution & Eradication

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (11/16/22) – Backlog Shifts, Green Battery Storage, and Russia-Ukraine Updates

    4 Breakthrough Panama Canal Engineering Innovations

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    CGL Insurer’s Duty To Defend Broader Than Duty To Indemnify And Based On Allegations In Underlying Complaint

    Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’s
    Corporate Profile

    NASH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Nash County, North Carolina Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Nash County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Nash County, North Carolina

    Applying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective Specifications

    March 31, 2026 —
    An older case deals with three important considerations: (1) defective specifications; (2) whether the defective specifications were misleading or misrepresentative; and (3) applying the jury verdict method in quantifying damages. In Metric Construction Co., Inc. v. U.S., 80 Fed. Cl. 178 (Fed. Cl. 2008), a contractor was contracted by the federal government to construct a warehouse. There were defects in the structural steel design specifications underlying the standing seam metal roof installed by the contractor and, as a result, the roof system leaked causing damage. The contractor incurred significant costs in repairing the damage, and pursued recovery of these costs against the government. The contractor claimed the structural steel design serving as the framework for the metal roof was defective and misleading and caused the leaks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    The Seventh Circuit Rejects Navigators Insurance Company’s Attempt to Escape Additional Insured Coverage For a Gas Explosion

    March 24, 2026 —
    In a recent Seventh Circuit decision, Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Navigators Insurance Company, the court addressed a theme that policyholders are often confronted with by insurers[1] – insurers disputing additional insured coverage where the named insured is not named in the underlying action. The court aptly rejected this position since it was undisputed that the bodily injuries alleged in the underlying lawsuits were due to a gas explosion that was “caused, in whole or in part, by” the named insured’s acts or omissions. I. Background The additional insureds, Atlanta Gas Light Company and Southern Company Gas (collectively, “AGL”), retained the named insured, United States Infrastructure Corporation (“USIC”), to locate and mark gas lines that AGL owned in Georgia. USIC failed to mark a certain gas line, which was later struck by a boring company, leading to an explosion that injured three people. Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    February 23, 2026 —
    On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the repeal of the 2009 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and the elimination of all federal GHG emission standards for motor vehicles and engines.1 The EPA characterized the action as the “single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history.”2 This development marks a fundamental shift in federal climate policy under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and is expected to trigger immediate and extensive litigation. In Massachusetts v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court held that GHGs qualify as “air pollutants” under the CAA and that the EPA must determine whether emissions from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare under CAA Section 202(a).3 Following this decision, on December 7, 2009, the EPA issued two findings. First, the EPA classified six different GHGs as threatening public health and welfare. Second, the EPA determined that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to that endangerment.4 Although the findings themselves imposed no direct regulatory requirements, they served as the legal predicate for GHG emission standards for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, and later for other CAA programs affecting statutory sources. In 2012, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the Endangerment Finding and related regulations.5 Reprinted courtesy of Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    CEO: Power Isn’t the Only Electrical Challenge for AI Data Centers

    April 14, 2026 —
    Everyone knows that data centers are voracious consumers of electricity. In fact, the U.S. is currently scrambling to meet unprecedented levels of power demand not seen since the early days of electrification and the widespread adoption of air conditioning. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Francesco "Frio" Iorio, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    May 12, 2026 —
    Steel prices have continued trending downward after several years of volatility, according to Gordian’s latest analysis based on RSMeans Data. After dramatic spikes during the pandemic-era supply disruptions, the market has gradually stabilized as supply chains improve and demand softens in some construction segments. However, selective volatility and tariff uncertainty continue to influence pricing across the sector. Key findings from the report include:
    • Steel prices declining: The national average price of structural steel fell to about $2,343.93 per ton in January 2026, down 5.38% from the previous quarter and 7.18% year over year.
    • Longer-term price correction: Steel costs have been trending downward since 2024 after earlier volatility driven by inflation, supply shortages and global demand swings.
    Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Attorneys Named Finalists in 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards

    March 10, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been shortlisted as finalists for Corporate Counsel’s 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) Awards, which honor women leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in the legal profession. In the Law Firm Internal Collaborative Leadership category, Stephanie Jones was recognized for her exceptional ability to foster collaboration, mentor talent, and align colleagues across GRSM. Jones has consistently demonstrated leadership rooted in trust, inclusion, and shared purpose, qualities that have strengthened the firm during a period of extraordinary growth. Her impact on the firm’s culture and success will continue as she steps into her role as Chief Operating Partner in June 2026, where she will further build on her leadership in fostering teamwork, mentorship, and alignment across the firm’s national platform. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    $27B Meta Data Center Pushes Louisiana Toward Massive Power Expansion

    April 27, 2026 —
    Meta Platforms has reached an agreement with Entergy Louisiana to fund new energy infrastructure to support its planned $27-billion data center in Richland Parish, a project the company says could ultimately scale to 5 GW, becoming its largest facility to date. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has described the site as large enough to cover a significant portion of Manhattan. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Vince Kong, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Kong may be contacted at kongv@enr.com