BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Montgomery County Texas custom home expert witness Montgomery County Texas condominium expert witness Montgomery County Texas office building expert witness Montgomery County Texas tract home expert witness Montgomery County Texas retail construction expert witness Montgomery County Texas condominiums expert witness Montgomery County Texas hospital construction expert witness Montgomery County Texas high-rise construction expert witness Montgomery County Texas townhome construction expert witness Montgomery County Texas industrial building expert witness Montgomery County Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Montgomery County Texas custom homes expert witness Montgomery County Texas landscaping construction expert witness Montgomery County Texas low-income housing expert witness Montgomery County Texas Medical building expert witness Montgomery County Texas parking structure expert witness Montgomery County Texas multi family housing expert witness Montgomery County Texas housing expert witness Montgomery County Texas production housing expert witness Montgomery County Texas casino resort expert witness Montgomery County Texas structural steel construction expert witness Montgomery County Texas
    Montgomery County Texas expert witnesses fenestrationMontgomery County Texas concrete expert witnessMontgomery County Texas testifying construction expert witnessMontgomery County Texas consulting engineersMontgomery County Texas construction code expert witnessMontgomery County Texas defective construction expertMontgomery County Texas ada design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Montgomery County, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Montgomery County Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4500
    313 E 12th St Ste 210
    Austin, TX 78701

    Montgomery County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4500
    313 E 12th St Ste 210
    Austin, TX 78701

    Montgomery County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Austin
    Local # 4512
    8140 Exchange Dr
    Austin, TX 78754

    Montgomery County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Austin
    Local # 4512
    8140 Exchange Dr
    Austin, TX 78754

    Montgomery County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of SE Texas
    Local # 4515
    5655 Eastex Freeway Ste M6A
    Beaumont, TX 77706

    Montgomery County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of SE Texas
    Local # 4515
    5655 Eastex Freeway Ste M6A
    Beaumont, TX 77706

    Montgomery County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of the Highland Lakes
    Local # 4558
    1401 Broadway St Ste B1
    Marble Falls, TX 78654

    Montgomery County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Montgomery County Texas


    Circuit Court Lacks Appellate Jurisdiction Over Order Compelling Appraisal

    Construction Leads World Trade Center Area Vulnerable to Flooding

    Contractual Warranty Agreements May Preclude Future Tort Recovery

    Wisconsin Federal Court Addresses Scope Of Appraisal Provision In Rental Dwelling Policy

    Here's How Much You Can Make by Renting Out Your Home

    Let’s Get Specific: Rhode Island Court Asserts Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Manufacturer

    Beyond the Statute: How the Colorado Court Upheld Modified Accrual in Construction Contracts

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Industry News: New Partner at Burdman Law Group

    Some Construction Contract Basics- Necessities and Pitfalls

    Liability Insurer Precluded from Intervening in Insured’s Lawsuit

    Substantial Completion Explained: What Contractors & Owners Should Know

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It

    In Review: SCOTUS Environmental and Administrative Decisions in the 2020 Term

    Get Your Contracts Lean- Its Better than Dieting

    Agree First or it May Cost You Later

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Eliminates Loss from Hurricane

    'Major' Mass. Gas Leak Follows Feds Call For Regulation Changes One Year After Deadly Gas Explosions

    Mediation is (Almost) Always Worth a Shot

    BIOHM Seeks to Turn Plastic Waste into Insulation Material with Mushrooms

    Fifth Circuit Concludes Government’s CAA Legal Claims are Time-Barred But Injunctive-Relief Claims are Not

    How AB5 has Changed the Employment Landscape

    Seyfarth’s Brenda Radmacher Presents at Construction Defect and Insurance Conference

    Appellate Court Reinforces When the Attorney-Client Relationship Ends for Purposes of “Continuous Representation” Tolling Provision of Legal Malpractice Statute of Limitations

    The Seventh Circuit Rejects Navigators Insurance Company’s Attempt to Escape Additional Insured Coverage For a Gas Explosion

    New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Imposes Increased Disclosure Requirements On Defendants at the Beginning of Lawsuits

    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara LLP Attorneys to Speak at the 2016 National Construction Claims Conference

    Can Anyone Save Gary, Indiana?

    Quick Note: Attorney’s Fees on Attorney’s Fees

    Texas Case Exposes Cracks in the Government Contractor Immunity Shield

    Mississippi Sues Over Public Health Lab Defects

    Lakewood First City in Colorado to Pass Ordinance Limiting State Construction Defect Law

    Smart Contracts Poised to Impact the Future of Construction

    Fewer NYC Construction Deaths as Safety Law Awaits Governor's Signature

    Deescalating Hyper Escalation

    Daniel Ferhat Receives Two Awards for Service to the Legal Community

    Attorney's Erroneous Conclusion that Limitations Period Had Not Expired Was Not Grounds For Relief Under C.C.P. § 473(b)

    Environmental Suit Against Lockheed Martin Dismissed

    Keep It Simple: Summarize (Voluminous Evidence, That Is...)

    Appellate Division Confirms Summary Judgment in Favor of Property Owners in Action Alleging Labor Law Violations

    New Mexico Architect Is Tuned Into His State

    Undercover Sting Nabs Eleven Illegal Contractors in California

    Will Colorado Pass a Construction Defect Reform Bill in 2016?

    Reminder: A Little Pain Now Can Save a Lot of Pain Later

    Neither Designated Work Exclusion nor Pre-Existing Damage Exclusion Defeat Duty to Defend

    The ALI Restatement – What Lies Ahead?

    Arezoo Jamshidi Selected to the 2023 San Diego Super Lawyers List

    Is the Obsession With Recordable Injury Rates a Deadly Safety Distraction?

    Top 10 OSHA Violations For The Construction Industry In 2023
    Corporate Profile

    MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Montgomery County, Texas Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Montgomery County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Montgomery County, Texas

    Massachusetts Nuclear Verdict Leads To $90M Bad Faith Award

    February 10, 2026 —
    Insurers in Massachusetts have long struggled with the demands of MGL ch. G.L.c 176D, § 3(9)(f), which requires “prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear.” Last month a Superior Court ruling illustrated the potentially draconian consequences of a violation: finding an insurer liable for more than $90 million in bad faith damages, in a case that might have settled under $3 million with proper handling. The claimant, John Rooney, was a mason who fell off a scaffold at a construction site. He sued the general contractor. The general contractor, in turn, sought coverage as an additional insured under a series of Liberty Mutual policies issued to Rooney’s employer – the masonry company – with combined aggregate limits of $19.5 million. Reprinted courtesy of Eric B. Hermanson, White and Williams and Timothy J. Langan, White and Williams Mr. Hermanson may be contacted at hermansone@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Langan may be contacted at langant@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    June 01, 2026 —
    AEC companies trying to operationalize AI often find they lack the data foundation on which to build. There may be an abundance of data hidden in documents, but you can’t reliably use it for AI. The lack of data quality was a key topic discussed at the AI in AEC 2026 conference. During the event, I met many experts working to solve this problem, including Pavlina Nikolova, Egnyte‘s EMEA AEC Practice Lead. The chat and her presentation highlighted the challenges and ways to overcome them. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse

    April 27, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment to the insurer after agreeing that the policy’s anti-concurrent causation clause barred coverage. Lido Hospitality, Inc. v. AIX Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 Iii. App. Unpub. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026). One of the brick veneer walls of the Lido Motel collapsed during a windstorm. Lido reported the loss it its insurer, AIX. AIX investigated and determined that the brick veneer collapsed due to pervasive wear and tear and corrosion of the underlying infrastructure that secured the veneer- specifically the components that anchored or tied the masonry veneer to the underlying wooden substrate. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Modular Construction’s Hidden Risk: Where Things Go Wrong Between the Factory and the Field

    June 15, 2026 —
    Introduction As modular and prefabricated construction methods are increasingly adopted, so too are the potential challenges that come with them. The appeal is straightforward: faster timelines, controlled fabrication environments, and reduced on-site labor demands. But the risks that accompany these benefits are often less clear—and, in many cases, poorly defined. For example, what happens when a prefabricated component is delayed past its installation window? Who is responsible for a defect discovered inside a sealed, installed module? What happens to warranty obligations when a prefabricated component must be modified on site? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com