BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Midland County Michigan custom home expert witness Midland County Michigan casino resort expert witness Midland County Michigan condominium expert witness Midland County Michigan condominiums expert witness Midland County Michigan retail construction expert witness Midland County Michigan tract home expert witness Midland County Michigan industrial building expert witness Midland County Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Midland County Michigan Medical building expert witness Midland County Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Midland County Michigan custom homes expert witness Midland County Michigan multi family housing expert witness Midland County Michigan housing expert witness Midland County Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Midland County Michigan office building expert witness Midland County Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Midland County Michigan parking structure expert witness Midland County Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Midland County Michigan hospital construction expert witness Midland County Michigan townhome construction expert witness Midland County Michigan low-income housing expert witness Midland County Michigan
    Midland County Michigan eifs expert witnessMidland County Michigan construction cost estimating expert witnessMidland County Michigan engineering expert witnessMidland County Michigan contractor expert witnessMidland County Michigan engineering consultantMidland County Michigan ada design expert witnessMidland County Michigan delay claim expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Midland County, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Midland County Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builder & Remodelers of Greater Northwest Michigan
    Local # 2357
    PO Box 1062
    Big Rapids, MI 49307

    Midland County Michigan Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builder & Remodelers of Greater Northwest Michigan
    Local # 2357
    PO Box 1062
    Big Rapids, MI 49307

    Midland County Michigan Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central Michigan
    Local # 2364
    2026 Independence Dr
    Mount Pleasant, MI 48858

    Midland County Michigan Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central Michigan
    Local # 2364
    2026 Independence Dr
    Mount Pleasant, MI 48858

    Midland County Michigan Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Midland County
    Local # 2360
    PO Box 1763 7600 Commerce Court Ste. C
    Midland, MI 48641

    Midland County Michigan Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Midland County
    Local # 2360
    PO Box 1763 7600 Commerce Court Ste. C
    Midland, MI 48641

    Midland County Michigan Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Michigan
    Local # 2390
    PO Box 247
    Hesperia, MI 49421

    Midland County Michigan Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Midland County Michigan


    Court Compels Appraisal Although Coverage Issues Exist

    Palm Beach Billionaires’ Fix for Sinking Megamansions: Build Bigger

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    Third Circuit Limits Pennsylvania’s Kvaerner Decision; Unexpected and Unintended Injury May Constitute an “Occurrence” Under Pennsylvania Law

    The Increasing Trend of Caps in Construction Contracts and Negotiating Them

    Deescalating Hyper Escalation

    JPMorgan Blamed for ‘Zombie’ Properties in Miami Lawsuit

    Local Government’s Claims on Developer Bonds Dismissed for Failure to Pursue Administrative Remedies

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    Hawaii Federal District Rejects Another Construction Defect Claim

    Who's Who Legal Recognizes Two White and Williams Lawyers as Thought/Global Leaders in Insurance and Reinsurance

    Subcontractors Aren’t Helpless

    Supreme Court Upholds Prevailing Wage Statute

    The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver

    How to Survive the Insurance Claim Process Before It Starts –Five Tips to Keep Your Insurance Healthy

    These Roads Aren’t Built for Wilder Weather Driven by Climate Change

    Discussing Parametric Design with Shajay Bhooshan of Zaha Hadid Architects

    Rooftop Solar Leases Scaring Buyers When Homeowners Sell

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    Montreal Bridge Builders Sue Canada Over New Restrictions

    Ritzy NYC Tower Developer Says Residents’ Lawsuit ‘Ill-Advised’

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/8/24) – Hotel Labor Disputes, a Congressional Real Estate Caucus and Freddie Mac’s New Policies

    West Virginia Couple Claim Defects in Manufactured Home

    Construction Calamity: Risk Transfer Tips for Contractors After a Catastrophic Loss

    Claims for Bad Faith and Punitive Damages Survive Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    New York Construction Practice Team Obtains Summary Judgment and Dismissal of Labor Law Claims

    KB Home Names New President of its D.C. Metro Division

    Los Angeles Seeks Speedier Way to Build New Affordable Homes

    Bar to Raise on Green Standard

    Million-Dollar U.S. Housing Loans Surge to Record Level

    Illinois Legislature Enables Pre-Judgment Interest in Personal Injury Cases

    How Algorithmic Design Improves Collaboration in Building Design

    Keep it Simple with Nunn-Agreements in Colorado

    Following Pennsylvania Trend, Federal Court Finds No Coverage For Construction Defect

    Common Construction Contract Provisions: Indemnity Provisions

    Eighth Circuit Rejects Retroactive Application of Construction Defect Legislation

    OH Supreme Court Rules Against General Contractor in Construction Defect Coverage Dispute

    Stay of Coverage Case Appropriate While Court Determines Arbitrability of Dispute

    Circumstances In Which Design Professional Has Construction Lien Rights

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Assembly Bill 1701 Contemplates Broader Duty to Subcontractor’s Employees by General Contractor

    Drones Used Despite Uncertain Legal Consequences

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Illinois Law Bars Coverage for Construction Defects in Insured's Work

    Be Careful with “Green” Construction

    Eighth Circuit Finds that “Ensuing Loss” Clause Does Not Restore Coverage for Faulty Subcontractor Work

    State Farm Unsuccessful In Seeking Dismissal of Qui Tam Case

    Not All Work is Covered Under the Federal Miller Act

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standard for Imposing Spoliation Sanctions

    Fannie-Freddie Propose Liquidity Rules for Mortgage Insurers
    Corporate Profile

    MIDLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Midland County, Michigan Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Midland County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Midland County, Michigan

    Predict Risk, Not Incidents: A New Analytics Framework for Your Construction Safety Data

    August 03, 2026 —
    Behind every “zero-incidents” company report, hidden hazards may already be accumulating—risks that could become serious injuries tomorrow. The question every executive should be asking is not, “Did anything go wrong last month?” It is: “Where is risk building on my projects right now?” Most construction organizations cannot answer that question. Not because the data does not exist—it does. Every active project generates daily inspection findings, labor records, near-miss reports and audit results. The problem is that standard safety systems collect this data and then report it in ways that make it operationally useless for prevention. They describe the past. They predict nothing. The predictive safety analytics framework (PSAF) is a practical, deployable system developed from years of applying data science to large-scale construction portfolio operations that takes the safety data construction organizations already collect and transforms it into a forward-looking risk signal. The result? A single weekly score that tells executives where risk is concentrating across their portfolio before anyone gets hurt. Reprinted courtesy of Tabrez Zahoor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    How AEC Firms Move AI Beyond the Pilot

    July 27, 2026 —
    Most AEC firms can run an AI pilot, but few can scale it. Enthusiasm for a first experiment rarely extends beyond the pilot team, leaving the pilot as an isolated win that never changes how the company works. In a recent AEC Business Podcast episode, Adeline Chan, CEO and co-founder of Hong Kong-based AAL Innovation, explained why that gap exists and what separates the firms that close it from those that stall. The Pilot Mindset that Holds Construction Back Adeline draws a sharp contrast between finance and construction. Banks cannot afford to fall behind their competitors, so they pilot constantly, sometimes running hundreds of proof-of-concept teams in parallel and letting them compete internally to identify the approach that works. The winning concept becomes the standard and scales across the organization, and the return on investment is measured in undeniable numbers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    June 29, 2026 —
    The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and because he did not believe that the cost of the damage from the storm would exceed the policy’s deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Surety Liability Is Coextensive with Its Bond Principal

    April 14, 2026 —
    A recent Miller act payment bond case, U.S. f/u/b/o Whitetail General Constructors v. Northcon, Inc., 2026 WL 46671 (D.Mont. 2026), contains a short noteworthy discussion as to a surety’s liability being coextensive with that of its bond principal. If you are bonded, or you are pursuing a bond, you need to appreciate this, which is why this is a noteworthy discussion:
    A “surety’s liability on a Miller Act bond must be at least coextensive with the obligations imposed by the Act if the bond is to have its intended effect.” “Therefore, ‘the liability of a surety and its principal on a Miller Act payment bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of the principal only to the extent that it is consistent with the rights and obligations created under the Miller Act.’” In other words, “[w]here a subcontract’s terms are consistent with the Miller Act’s provisions, the surety’s liability on the Miller Act bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of its princip[al].”
    “The liability of a surety under the Miller Act is controlled by federal law, rather than state contract law[.]” The court may, however, “look to state law when interpreting contractual provisions” in a Miller Act case.
    “[T]he measure of recovery under the Miller Act is generally determined by the terms of the subcontract [or underlying contract].”
    Northcon, supra, at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    July 20, 2026 —
    The Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale. The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark O. Morris, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Morris may be contacted at mmorris@swlaw.com

    The Construction Defect Litigation Podcast: Navigating Multi-Party Construction Defect Litigation

    September 08, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld Construction Defect Practice Group Chair Ivette Kincaid and attorney Thomas McCarrick recently joined the Construction Defect Litigation podcast to discuss the challenges—and strategies—behind complex construction defect matters involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on their experience, Ivette and Thomas explore practical approaches to:
    • Identifying key parties and understanding how claims and crossclaims develop
    • Working with experts to evaluate defects, causation and damages
    • Managing procedural challenges, including scheduling, document management and depositions
    • Applying thoughtful case management strategies to position complex matters for successful resolution
    Reprinted courtesy of Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld and Thomas McCarrick, Kahana Feld Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at tmccarrick@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    June 02, 2026 —
    Orange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California. In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve." "Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois