BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Lincoln County Colorado custom homes expert witness Lincoln County Colorado custom home expert witness Lincoln County Colorado structural steel construction expert witness Lincoln County Colorado mid-rise construction expert witness Lincoln County Colorado low-income housing expert witness Lincoln County Colorado Subterranean parking expert witness Lincoln County Colorado industrial building expert witness Lincoln County Colorado multi family housing expert witness Lincoln County Colorado condominiums expert witness Lincoln County Colorado retail construction expert witness Lincoln County Colorado condominium expert witness Lincoln County Colorado hospital construction expert witness Lincoln County Colorado parking structure expert witness Lincoln County Colorado institutional building expert witness Lincoln County Colorado office building expert witness Lincoln County Colorado tract home expert witness Lincoln County Colorado Medical building expert witness Lincoln County Colorado landscaping construction expert witness Lincoln County Colorado high-rise construction expert witness Lincoln County Colorado housing expert witness Lincoln County Colorado production housing expert witness Lincoln County Colorado
    Lincoln County Colorado concrete expert witnessLincoln County Colorado expert witness roofingLincoln County Colorado building envelope expert witnessLincoln County Colorado defective construction expertLincoln County Colorado construction claims expert witnessLincoln County Colorado roofing construction expertLincoln County Colorado consulting general contractor
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lincoln County, Colorado

    Colorado Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1161 has three significant components that effect construction defect litigation. The first is a right to remedy and notice provision (75 days written notice) The homeowner must give the builder a notice that describes the nature of the claimed construction defects, the location of the defects and a general description of the type of damages that are claimed. The second component is a limitation on the nature and type of damages that can be pursued and awarded in a construction defect case. The third is a limitation on the availability and amount of punitive damages ($250,000) under the provisions of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lincoln County Colorado

    State license required for electrical, asbestos removal, plumbers, and pesticides trade; no state license for general contracting. Licensing may be required on a city or county level.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mountain to Mesa Home Builders Association
    Local # 0670
    PO Box 2719
    Glenwood Springs, CO 81602

    Lincoln County Colorado Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mountain to Mesa Home Builders Association
    Local # 0670
    PO Box 2719
    Glenwood Springs, CO 81602

    Lincoln County Colorado Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Summit County Builders Association
    Local # 0688
    PO Box 2245
    Frisco, CO 80443

    Lincoln County Colorado Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Summit County Builders Association
    Local # 0688
    PO Box 2245
    Frisco, CO 80443

    Lincoln County Colorado Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Housing and Bldng Assn of Northwestern Colorado
    Local # 0664
    569 S Westgate Dr Ste 3
    Grand Junction, CO 81505

    Lincoln County Colorado Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Housing and Bldng Assn of Northwestern Colorado
    Local # 0664
    569 S Westgate Dr Ste 3
    Grand Junction, CO 81505

    Lincoln County Colorado Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eagle Valley Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 0652
    PO Box 3550
    Eagle, CO 81631

    Lincoln County Colorado Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lincoln County Colorado

    Corporate Profile

    LINCOLN COUNTY COLORADO ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Lincoln County, Colorado Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Lincoln County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Lincoln County, Colorado

    The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England

    April 14, 2026 —
    On March 31, 2026, the governors of all six New England states issued a joint, bipartisan statement committing the region to explore deployment of advanced nuclear energy technologies while supporting the continued safe, affordable and reliable operation of New England’s existing nuclear generation facilities. This coordinated regional initiative follows a major policy announcement in June 2025 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul directing the New York Power Authority to pursue development of at least 1,000 MW of advanced nuclear generation to support statewide reliability needs and New York’s zero‑carbon mission. Less than one year after New York formally embraced a modern nuclear renaissance, that renaissance has now expanded across the New England states—signaling a broader Northeast regional pivot toward nuclear as a core element of long‑term reliability, affordability and decarbonization strategies. For utilities and power generators, this shift creates both opportunities and planning imperatives that warrant immediate attention. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury
    Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com

    GRSM Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen Recognized as 2026 Legal Visionary by Los Angeles Times

    June 02, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly congratulates Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen on being named a 2026 Legal Visionary by the Los Angeles Times. The LA Times Studios 2026 Legal Visionaries List recognizes lawyers in Southern California who “exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it.” Meppen is recognized for helping shape the future of the legal profession through her leadership, professionalism, and integrity. Published as part of the May 2026 issue highlighting Southern California’s leading law firms and attorneys, the Legal Visionaries section honors attorneys making a significant impact on the legal industry and the broader business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Surety Liability Is Coextensive with Its Bond Principal

    April 14, 2026 —
    A recent Miller act payment bond case, U.S. f/u/b/o Whitetail General Constructors v. Northcon, Inc., 2026 WL 46671 (D.Mont. 2026), contains a short noteworthy discussion as to a surety’s liability being coextensive with that of its bond principal. If you are bonded, or you are pursuing a bond, you need to appreciate this, which is why this is a noteworthy discussion:
    A “surety’s liability on a Miller Act bond must be at least coextensive with the obligations imposed by the Act if the bond is to have its intended effect.” “Therefore, ‘the liability of a surety and its principal on a Miller Act payment bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of the principal only to the extent that it is consistent with the rights and obligations created under the Miller Act.’” In other words, “[w]here a subcontract’s terms are consistent with the Miller Act’s provisions, the surety’s liability on the Miller Act bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of its princip[al].”
    “The liability of a surety under the Miller Act is controlled by federal law, rather than state contract law[.]” The court may, however, “look to state law when interpreting contractual provisions” in a Miller Act case.
    “[T]he measure of recovery under the Miller Act is generally determined by the terms of the subcontract [or underlying contract].”
    Northcon, supra, at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    August 03, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale Partner Jonathan Aihie was recently named to The National Bar Association (NBA) “Top 40 Under 40” list. The NBA “Top 40 Under 40” recognizes the nation's top lawyers under the age of 40 who demonstrate professional excellence, leadership, and commitment to the community. Recipients represent a broad cross-section of the legal profession, including private practice, government, academia, the judiciary, corporate counsel, and public service. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Sometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .

    July 06, 2026 —
    It has been a while since I last posted here at Construction Law Musings. Life, law practice, and “blogger’s block” have taken their toll on the posting schedule. Hopefully this will be one of several upcoming posts now that the litigation schedule has lightened a bit over the summer. Today’s post is about damages. Specifically damage to a homeowner’s roof and her legal damages therefor. That last is of course a sentence that only a construction attorney (or other litigator) could possibly craft and have it make sense. Now, on with the case. . .In Coverage for Construction Defect Barred by Contractual-Liability Exclusion

    NIBS Consultative Council Issues Moving Forward Report on Healthy Buildings

    PSA: New COVID Vaccine ETS Issued by OSHA

    When is Mediation Appropriate for Your Construction Case?

    Exception to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not Apply

    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    Policy Renewals: Has Your Insurer Been Naughty or Nice?

    Narberth Mayor Urges Dubious Legal Action

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    Cost of Materials Holding Back Housing Industry

    Residential Mortgage Lenders and Servicers Beware of Changes to Rule 3002.1

    French President Vows to Rebuild Fire-Collapsed Notre Dame Roof and Iconic Sp
    Resulting Loss From Faulty Workmanship Covered

    U.S. Home Prices Climbed 0.1% in July as Gains Slowed

    Review your Additional Insured Endorsement

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    Woodbridge II and the Nuanced Meaning of “Adverse Use” in Hostile Property Rights Cases in Colorado

    SNC-Lavalin’s Former Head of Construction Pleads Guilty to Bribery, Money Laundering

    Repairs Could Destroy Evidence in Construction Defect Suit

    Avoid Five Common Fraudulent Schemes Used in Construction

    San Francisco Bucks U.S. Trend With Homeownership Gains

    Don’t Just Document- Document Right!

    The Vallagio HOA Appeals the Decision from the Colorado Court of Appeals

    AI Systems and the Real Estate Industry

    Seattle Developer Defaults on Renovated Office Buildings

    Texas LGI Homes Goes After First-Time Homeowners

    Liability Policy’s Arbitration Endorsement Applies to Third Party Beneficiaries, Including Additional Insureds

    Haight Welcomes Elizabeth Lawley

    David M. McLain to Speak at the CLM Claims College - School of Construction - Scholarships Available

    Payne & Fears Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2025 Best Law Firms®

    Let’s Give ‘Em Sutton to Talk About: Tennessee Court Enforces Sutton Doctrine

    Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court Limits The Scope Of A Builder’s Implied Warranty Of Habitability

    The Supreme Court’s Administrative and Regulatory Law Rulings in the 2024 Term and Preview of Cases to Be Decided in Fall 2025

    Labor Shortages In Construction

    The Biggest Trials Coming to Courts Around the World in 2021

    Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Design Liability in GSA Contract Dispute

    Exclusion for Construction of Condominiums Includes Faulty Construction of Retaining Wall

    Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v. Antero Treatment LLC: Colorado Court of Appeals Addresses Fraud in Design-Build Contracts

    Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants

    Turmoil Slows Rebuilding of Puerto Rico's Power Grid

    An Overview of the New EPA HVAC Refrigerant Regulations and Its Implications for the Construction Industry

    In Contracts, One Word Makes All the Difference

    Construction Spending Had Strongest Increase in Four Years

    What to Know Before Building a Guesthouse

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (11/12/25) – Banks Weather CRE Storm, Industrial Outdoor Storage Markets Soar, and Office Vacancy Decline

    Lower Manhattan Condos Rival Midtown’s Luxury Skyscrapers

    Nancy Conrad Recognized in Lehigh Valley Business 2024 Power in Law List

    New Jersey Law regarding Prior Expert’s Testimony

    Bay Area Counties Issue Less Restrictive “Shelter in Place” Orders, Including for Construction

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Will Not Address Trigger for DEP Environmental Cleanup Action at This Time

    Here's Proof Homebuilders are Betting on a Pickup in the Housing Market

    Suspend the Work, but Don’t Get Fired

    Waiving Workers’ Compensation Immunity for Indemnity: Demystifying a Common and Scary-Looking Contract Term

    Statutory Time Limits for Construction Defects in Massachusetts

    Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the San Diego Business Journal

    Constructive Notice Established as Obstacle to Relation Back Doctrine

    Economic Damages Cannot be Based On Speculation

    Decaying U.S. Roads Attract Funds From KKR to DoubleLine

    One More Mechanic’s Lien Number- the Number 30

    California Beach Hotel to Get $185 Million Luxury Rebuild

    White House’s New Draft Guidance Limiting NEPA Review of Greenhouse Gas Impacts Is Not So New or Limiting

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/29/25) – Office Market Bounces Back, Senate Passes ROAD to Housing Act, and CRE Embraces Blockchain