BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Lancaster County Virginia institutional building expert witness Lancaster County Virginia townhome construction expert witness Lancaster County Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Lancaster County Virginia tract home expert witness Lancaster County Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Lancaster County Virginia parking structure expert witness Lancaster County Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Lancaster County Virginia housing expert witness Lancaster County Virginia casino resort expert witness Lancaster County Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Lancaster County Virginia retail construction expert witness Lancaster County Virginia Medical building expert witness Lancaster County Virginia condominium expert witness Lancaster County Virginia hospital construction expert witness Lancaster County Virginia custom homes expert witness Lancaster County Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Lancaster County Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Lancaster County Virginia office building expert witness Lancaster County Virginia condominiums expert witness Lancaster County Virginia production housing expert witness Lancaster County Virginia multi family housing expert witness Lancaster County Virginia
    Lancaster County Virginia contractor expert witnessLancaster County Virginia construction defect expert witnessLancaster County Virginia construction defect expert witnessLancaster County Virginia architectural expert witnessLancaster County Virginia expert witnesses fenestrationLancaster County Virginia window expert witnessLancaster County Virginia expert witness concrete failure
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lancaster County, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lancaster County Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Richmond
    Local # 4872
    400 North Ridge Road
    Richmond, VA 23229

    Lancaster County Virginia Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Richmond
    Local # 4872
    400 North Ridge Road
    Richmond, VA 23229

    Lancaster County Virginia Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Virginia-State
    Local # 4800
    707 E Franklin St
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Lancaster County Virginia Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Virginia-State
    Local # 4800
    707 E Franklin St
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Lancaster County Virginia Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Rappahannock
    Local # 4847
    PO Box 88
    Wicomico Church, VA 22579
    Lancaster County Virginia Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Rappahannock
    Local # 4847
    PO Box 88
    Wicomico Church, VA 22579
    Lancaster County Virginia Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central VA
    Local # 4827
    20334 Timberlake Rd Ste 3
    Lynchburg, VA 24502

    Lancaster County Virginia Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lancaster County Virginia


    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    Poor Record Keeping = Going to the Poor House (or, why project documentation matters)

    Georgia State and Local Governments Receive Expanded Authority for Conservation Projects

    Infrared Photography Illuminates Construction Defects and Patent Trolling

    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    Business Insurance Names Rachel Hudgins Among 2024 Break Out Award Winners

    Saving Manhattan: Agencies, Consultants, Contractors Join Fight to Keep New York City Above Water

    Was Jury Right in Negligent Construction Case?

    Insurer Waives Objection to Appraiser's Partiality by Waiting Until Appraisal Issued

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof

    California Federal Court Finds a Breach of Contract Exclusion in a CGL Policy Bars All Coverage for a Construction Defect Action

    Investigation of Orange County Landslide

    Traub Lieberman Partners Lisa Rolle, Erin O’Dea, and Nicole Verzillo Win Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Property Owner

    Construction Contracts and The Uniform Commercial Code: When Does it Apply and Understanding the Pre-Dominant Factor Test

    Insured's Challenge to Use of Xactimate Software to Determine Repair Costs for Damage Fails

    How Technology Reduces the Risk of Façade Defects

    Jason Smith and Teddie Arnold Co-Author Updated “United States – Construction” Chapter in 2024 Legal 500: Country Comparative Guides

    A Word to the Wise about Construction Defects

    De-escalating The Impact of Price Escalation

    Construction Law Advisory: Mechanical Contractor Scores Victory in Prevailing Wage Dispute

    Do You Have the Receipt? Pennsylvania Court Finds Insufficient Evidence That Defendant Sold the Product

    Court Affirms Duty to Defend Additional Insured Contractor

    Travelers v. Larimer County and the Concept of Covered Cause of Loss

    Reconstructing the Francis Scott Key Bridge Utilizing the Progressive Design-Build Method

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/29/25) – Office Market Bounces Back, Senate Passes ROAD to Housing Act, and CRE Embraces Blockchain

    The Big Three: The 9th Circuit Joins The 6th Circuit and 7th Circuit in Holding That Sanctions For Bad-Faith Litigation Tactics Can Only Be Awarded Against Individual Lawyers and Not Law Firms

    U.S. Judge Says Wal-Mart Must Face Mexican-Bribe Claims

    The Importance of the Recent Amendment to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence

    Key Legal Issues to Consider Before and After Natural Disasters

    Top Talked-About Tech at the 2023 ABC Joint Tech Summit

    Insured's Commercial Property Policy Deemed Excess Over Unobtained Flood Policy

    OSHA Set to Tag More Firms as Severe Violators Under New Criteria

    Coverage Denied Where Occurrence Takes Place Outside Coverage Territory

    Cameron Pledges to Double Starter Homes to Boost Supply

    My Employees Could Have COVID-19. What Now?

    Motion for Summary Judgment Gets Pooped Upon

    Paris ‘Locks of Love’ Overload Bridges, Threatening Structures

    New York City Council’s Carbon Emissions Regulation Opposed by Real Estate Board

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    Summary Judgment for Insurer on Construction Defect Claim Reversed

    Nonresidential Construction Employment Expands in August, Says ABC

    South Dakota Supreme Court Holds That Faulty Workmanship Constitutes an “Occurrence”

    Hawaii Court Looks at Changes to Construction Defect Coverage after Changes in Law

    Kahana Feld Partner Eran Forster Obtains a Motion for Summary Judgment

    LaGuardia Airport Is a Mess. An Engineer-Turned-Fund Manager Has a Fix

    Congratulations to all of our 2023 Attorneys Named as Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    4 Lessons Contractors Can Learn From The COVID-19 Crisis

    Seattle’s Audacious Aquarium Throws Builders Swerves, Curves, Twists and Turns

    Out of the Black

    Housing Inflation Begins to Rise
    Corporate Profile

    LANCASTER COUNTY VIRGINIA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Lancaster County, Virginia Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Lancaster County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Lancaster County, Virginia

    WSHB Managing Partner Chad Dunigan Named Finalist for Jerrold S. Oliver "Ollie" Award of Excellence

    May 12, 2026 —
    Chad Dunigan, Managing Partner of Wood Smith Henning & Berman's Orlando, Florida, office, has been selected as one of just four finalists for the prestigious Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence, affectionately known in the construction defect community as the "Ollie" Award. This distinguished honor recognizes individuals who have made exceptional contributions and demonstrated unwavering dedication to advancing the field of construction defect law. Named in honor of the late Judge Jerrold S. Oliver, a revered founder of alternative dispute resolution in construction defect claims and litigation, the Ollie award symbolizes loyalty, commitment, and trust within the industry. Judge Oliver's legacy as a staunch believer in the resolution process continues to inspire professionals who strive for excellence in the construction defect community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wood Smith Henning Berman

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Four Families Now Live in the Season Six Rock the Block Homes in Grantsville, Utah

    April 20, 2026 —
    SALT LAKE CITY, April 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The premier of Rock the Block season seven aired last Monday and is set in Las Vegas, Nevada. Rock The Block is HGTV's highest rated show. Last year, season six was set in Utah and had HGTV's highest rating yet, with over 14 million viewers. All episodes of season six were filmed in the Worthington Ranch community in Grantsville, Utah. The four homes on the show were built by Utah builder Hamlet Homes. During the show, the location of the four Rock The Block homes had to be kept secret and were surrounded by a locked gate. After over a year of being inaccessible, the Utah public was invited in May 2025 to tour the homes and help raise money together for charity. On May 30-31, 2025, Hamlet hosted a 'Rock The Block Party' where the public was able to walk through the homes made famous by the show. Hamlet Owner, VP of Marketing & Design Tami Ostmark shares stories from the show and her perspective of what it's like to be the builder on a national show like this. Ostmark was on set almost the entire time. "As expected, there were times when there was tension on the set. All four designers were super competitive with each other. It's amazing that the production team was able to produce the show as well as they did. I'm very impressed," said Ostmark. Another interesting point related to the show is how much work the local builder is responsible for. Some nights as many as 30 Hamlet team members worked through the night to keep up with the pace of production. "Each designer provided their own trusted carpenters to do finishing work. In two of the cases, designers' flew their favorite carpenters in to carry out their visions. Given the quick turnaround, it's not always practical for finishing work to be permanent. Sometimes, it just needs to look appealing on camera," said Ostmark. This is frequently referred to as 'TV Magic'. "When the show was over, Hamlet re-did any areas that required extra attention". The show really does shoot in only 7 weeks as depicted. This creates a fast pace that was very exciting to be a part of", continued Ostmark. All four of the homes featured on the show have since been purchased; four Utah families currently call them home. ABOUT HAMLET HOMES Hamlet Homes (www.hamlethomes.com) crafts quality customer-oriented townhomes and single-family homes located in attractively designed communities in Utah and Idaho. Since the company's founding in 1995, Hamlet has built over 5,000 homes in 80 communities. The company is a proud recipient of many awards on Sustainable Business & Design, Quality Builder Awards; recognized both locally and nationally. Named by the Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce as the 'Veteran Owned Small Business of the Year, in 2019'. Hamlet has since been named several times to the Professional Builder's Housing Giants List and annual HOME AWARDS Best Customer Experience. Most recently in 2026, Hamlet was named Utah's 'Best of State for Real Estate Development and Utah Businesses 'Best Companies to Work For' for the 6th consecutive year.

    White and Williams LLP Ranked in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 15, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to celebrate the Chambers USA 2026 Guide which has ranked several of the Firm's attorneys and practice groups, underscoring the Firm's overall commitment to providing client service excellence. The Chambers USA 2026 Guide recognized attorneys Tim Davis, Managing Partner, and Nancy Frantz, Chair of the Real Estate Group, for Real Estate: Finance in the state of Pennsylvania. Randy Maniloff, Partner, Patricia Santelle, Chair Emeritus/Former Managing Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner were ranked for Insurance in Pennsylvania, and Thomas Pinney, Partner, was ranked in Pennsylvania for Bankruptcy/Restructuring. In the state of Maryland, Partners David Gilliss and Eric Korphage were recognized for their work in Construction. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects

    March 17, 2026 —
    Introduction: The New Reality of Construction Communication Construction projects have always depended on a constant stream of communication. Today’s project managers, superintendents, and foremen have broadened the method of communication to include convenient forms of digital communication. Superintendents text photos of field conditions, owners send quick approvals through WhatsApp, architects clarify design intent in a Teams chat, and subcontractors coordinate sequencing through group texts. These channels are fast, convenient, and deeply embedded in modern project culture. Yet the legal framework governing construction contracts has not evolved at the same pace. Many contracts still assume – or require – that notice, directives, and approvals occur through formal written channels—letters, emails to designated recipients, or structured project‑management platforms. This disconnect creates significant legal risk, particularly for contractors who rely on informal messages as authorization for extra work or schedule changes. Courts are increasingly asked to interpret text messages, chat threads, and screenshots as evidence of notice, direction, or waiver. The outcomes vary, but the trend is unmistakable: informal digital communication is now part of the project record, and it can bind parties in ways they did not expect. Reprinted courtesy of Kellie Ros, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Curtis Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Ros may be contacted at kros@pecklaw.com Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Elliott Backed Venture Sues Lloyds Over Avant Cladding, Times Reports

    February 17, 2026 —
    Elliott Investment Management and British housing tycoon Jeff Fairburn, joint-venture partners in UK homebuilder Avant Homes Group, are suing Lloyds Banking Group Plc over who should pay to fix properties that fail to meet post-Grenfell fire-safety standards, the Times reported. Avant, which faces remediation costs of at least £107 million ($146 million) for potentially dangerous cladding, argues that Lloyds should shoulder part of the bill because most of the developments were built before 2014, when the homebuilder was under the bank’s ownership, the Times reported. Cladding has become a contentious issue in the UK following the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017, in which dozens died after flames spread rapidly through flammable exterior cladding on the West London high-rise, laying bare deep failures in Britain’s building safety regulations. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eamon Farhat, Bloomberg