BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Hughes County South Dakota retail construction expert witness Hughes County South Dakota office building expert witness Hughes County South Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Hughes County South Dakota Medical building expert witness Hughes County South Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Hughes County South Dakota institutional building expert witness Hughes County South Dakota tract home expert witness Hughes County South Dakota townhome construction expert witness Hughes County South Dakota low-income housing expert witness Hughes County South Dakota casino resort expert witness Hughes County South Dakota condominiums expert witness Hughes County South Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Hughes County South Dakota condominium expert witness Hughes County South Dakota industrial building expert witness Hughes County South Dakota housing expert witness Hughes County South Dakota custom home expert witness Hughes County South Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Hughes County South Dakota custom homes expert witness Hughes County South Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Hughes County South Dakota multi family housing expert witness Hughes County South Dakota production housing expert witness Hughes County South Dakota
    Hughes County South Dakota construction code expert witnessHughes County South Dakota reconstruction expert witnessHughes County South Dakota fenestration expert witnessHughes County South Dakota roofing and waterproofing expert witnessHughes County South Dakota expert witness roofingHughes County South Dakota contractor expert witnessHughes County South Dakota building code compliance expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hughes County, South Dakota

    South Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hughes County South Dakota

    No state license is required. A license is required for asbestos, plumbing, electrical, and well drilling trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    South Dakota Home Builders Association
    Local # 4300
    PO Box 1218
    Pierre, SD 57501

    Hughes County South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oahe Home Builders Association
    Local # 4360
    PO Box 221
    Pierre, SD 57501
    Hughes County South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Dakota Home Builders Association
    Local # 4300
    PO Box 1218
    Pierre, SD 57501

    Hughes County South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oahe Home Builders Association
    Local # 4360
    PO Box 221
    Pierre, SD 57501
    Hughes County South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Brookings Regional Builders Association
    Local # 4323
    PO Box 323
    Brookings, SD 57006

    Hughes County South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Brookings Regional Builders Association
    Local # 4323
    PO Box 323
    Brookings, SD 57006

    Hughes County South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Watertown Area Home Builders
    Local # 4375
    PO Box 1271 1017 6th Ave SE
    Watertown, SD 57201

    Hughes County South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hughes County South Dakota


    Avoid Drowning in Data: Keep Afloat with ESI in Construction Litigation

    Manhattan Luxury Condos Sit on Market While Foreign Buyers Wait

    House Bill Clarifies Start Point for Florida’s Statute of Repose

    Defense Owed to Directors and Officers Despite Insured vs. Insured Exclusion

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “A Less Than Valiant Effort”

    Biden Administration Focus on Environmental Justice Raises Questions for Industry

    Which Cities have the Most Affordable Homes?

    The Real Cost of ‘Dirt Cheap’ Walmart & Amazon Tiny Homes: 10 Things Consumers Should Know

    Illinois Couple Files Suit Against Home Builder

    Commercial Development Nearly Quadruples in Jacksonville Area

    CA Supreme Court Permits Insurers to Bring Direct Actions Seeking Reimbursement of Excessive Fees Against Cumis Counsel Under Limited Circumstances

    Zero-Energy Commercial Buildings Increase as Contractors Focus on Sustainability

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    No Coverage for Breach of Contract Claims Against Contractor

    CAUTION: Terms of CCP Section 998 Offers to Compromise Must Be Fully Contained in the Offer Itself

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Endorsements in CGL Insurance Policies: A Word of Caution

    OSHA Begins Enforcement of its Respirable Crystalline Silica in Construction Standard. Try Saying That Five Times Real Fast

    A New Vision for Safety: Construction Safety Week’s Five-Year Plan

    Cybersecurity on Your Project: Why Not Follow National Security Strategy?

    Kansas City Airport Terminal Project Faces Delays, Rising Costs

    Court Compels Appraisal Although Coverage Issues Exist

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Freight Train Carrying Hot Asphalt, Molten Sulfur Plunges Into Yellowstone River as Bridge Fails

    New York Appellate Division: Second Department Contradicts First Department, Denying Insurer's Recoupment of Defense Costs for Uncovered Claims

    Safety Accusations Fly in Dispute Between New York Developer and Contractor

    North Carolina Weakened Its Building Codes in 2013

    NAHB Speaks Out Against the Clean Water Act Expansion

    Wildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution Progress

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    The Trend in the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    North Carolina Appeals Court Threatens Long-Term Express Warranties

    New OSHA Vaccination Requirements For Employers With 100 Or More Employees (And Additional Advice for California Employers)

    Defense Owed for Product Liability Claims That Do Not Amount to Faulty Workmanship

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jason Moberly Caruso As Its Newest Partner

    What You Should Know About Liquidated Damages and Liability Caps for Delay and Performance Liquidated Damages

    Home Building on the Upswing in Bakersfield

    Circumstances In Which Design Professional Has Construction Lien Rights

    Fifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of Insured

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    ASCE Statement on Passage of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2022

    City in Ohio Sues Over Alleged Roof Defects

    NJ Court Reaffirms Rule Against Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Claims and Finds Fraud Claims Inherently Intentional

    Middle District of Florida Disregards Other Insurance Clause Where Subcontractor Contractually Promised to Indemnify General Contractor

    Withdrawal Liability? Read your CBA

    Manhattan Townhouse Sells for a Record $79.5 Million

    Assessments Underway After Hurricane Milton Rips Off Stadium Roof, Snaps Crane Boom in Florida

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a C-. It’s an Improvement Though
    Corporate Profile

    HUGHES COUNTY SOUTH DAKOTA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Hughes County, South Dakota Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Hughes County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Hughes County, South Dakota

    From Dark Data to Building Intelligence

    July 13, 2026 —
    In this episode, I talk with Mark Sorsa-Leslie, founder and CEO of Auttaa AI, whose team just won first place in Luotea’s inaugural hackathon in Helsinki for turning property maintenance from reactive firefighting into proactive forecasting with AI. Mark is a chartered surveyor with 30 years of real estate data experience, previously the founder of the UK sensor company Beringar. We discuss why so much building data stays dark and siloed, from outdated networking technology to the shortage of people who understand both engineering and property. Mark explains how Auttaa bridges real-time building data with large language models, using what he calls an “influence graph” to surface correlations and causation across previously disconnected systems, such as linking occupancy patterns to CO2 readings to diagnose ventilation problems in minutes rather than days. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release

    April 08, 2026 —
    Trumbull, Connecticut – Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV) is proud to announce the celebration of its 30th anniversary. Founded in 1996 by three attorneys in a small New Haven, Connecticut office, SDV was built on a clear and focused mission: representing policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Three decades later, that commitment remains at the core of the firm’s identity and has been instrumental in its continued success and reputation nationwide. Today, SDV is a nationally recognized boutique firm with 50 attorneys serving policyholders across the United States. Building on its longstanding reputation for excellence and client advocacy, the firm is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Massachusetts—an exciting milestone that reflects SDV’s continued growth. The new office is led by Managing Partner Anna Perry. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Massachusetts Nuclear Verdict Leads To $90M Bad Faith Award

    February 10, 2026 —
    Insurers in Massachusetts have long struggled with the demands of MGL ch. G.L.c 176D, § 3(9)(f), which requires “prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear.” Last month a Superior Court ruling illustrated the potentially draconian consequences of a violation: finding an insurer liable for more than $90 million in bad faith damages, in a case that might have settled under $3 million with proper handling. The claimant, John Rooney, was a mason who fell off a scaffold at a construction site. He sued the general contractor. The general contractor, in turn, sought coverage as an additional insured under a series of Liberty Mutual policies issued to Rooney’s employer – the masonry company – with combined aggregate limits of $19.5 million. Reprinted courtesy of Eric B. Hermanson, White and Williams and Timothy J. Langan, White and Williams Mr. Hermanson may be contacted at hermansone@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Langan may be contacted at langant@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Quick Note: Don’t Spoil Evidence!!!!

    March 10, 2026 —
    The phrase “spoliation of evidence” is a phrase that gets used, sometimes properly and sometimes improperly. The reason is that if evidence is legitimately spoiled, the opposing party wants an adverse inference jury instruction. There are two potential adverse inference jury instructions dealing with spoliation of evidence, neither of which are good, and one of which you definitely don’t want. A recent case discusses these jury instructions (check here) in a slip and fall personal injury case. The bottom line is that you need to preserve evidence relevant to a claim. Don’t lose it. Don’t intentionally destroy it. Don’t pretend it does not exist. Don’t do all the things that hinder the preservation and ultimate production of the relevant evidence. An adverse inference jury instruction (or an adverse inference implication in a non-jury trial) could be much, much worse. The facts are what the facts are. The best thing you can do is confront the facts. Confront the bad facts just like the good facts. The nature of any dispute is that there will be both good and bad facts. Bad facts can hopefully be explained recognizing there will be bad facts on the other side too. Sometimes, the bad facts warrant major strategic considerations and shifting the focus of how a dispute will be handled and presented. Whatever you do, don’t put yourself in a position where you are spoiling evidence. Once you get an adverse inference instruction, that’s it, as it’s very tough to overcome. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com