BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Hood River County Oregon industrial building expert witness Hood River County Oregon housing expert witness Hood River County Oregon tract home expert witness Hood River County Oregon custom home expert witness Hood River County Oregon casino resort expert witness Hood River County Oregon production housing expert witness Hood River County Oregon condominiums expert witness Hood River County Oregon hospital construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon retail construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon low-income housing expert witness Hood River County Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon institutional building expert witness Hood River County Oregon custom homes expert witness Hood River County Oregon condominium expert witness Hood River County Oregon multi family housing expert witness Hood River County Oregon office building expert witness Hood River County Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Hood River County Oregon townhome construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon
    Hood River County Oregon reconstruction expert witnessHood River County Oregon engineering consultantHood River County Oregon slope failure expert witnessHood River County Oregon consulting engineersHood River County Oregon ada design expert witnessHood River County Oregon expert witness structural engineerHood River County Oregon eifs expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hood River County, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hood River County Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035

    Hood River County Oregon Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035

    Hood River County Oregon Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838
    Hood River County Oregon Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838
    Hood River County Oregon Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138

    Hood River County Oregon Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138

    Hood River County Oregon Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Hood River County Oregon Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hood River County Oregon


    Comply with your Insurance Policy's Conditions Precedent (Post-Loss Obligations)

    Business Risk Exclusions Bar Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Do Not File a Miller Act Payment Bond Lawsuit After the One-Year Statute of Limitations

    Third Circuit Limits Pennsylvania’s Kvaerner Decision; Unexpected and Unintended Injury May Constitute an “Occurrence” Under Pennsylvania Law

    Louisiana 13th in List of Defective Bridges

    Burden Supporting Termination for Default

    New York Appellate Division Reverses Denial of Landlord’s Additional Insured Tender

    Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects

    Standard of Care

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    Is it time for a summer tune-up?

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    Elon Musk's Boring Co. Is Feuding With Texas Over a Driveway

    To Settle or Not Settle: Factors to Weigh and Practical Considerations

    Housing Starts Fall as U.S. Single-Family Projects Decline

    $1.9 Trillion Stimulus: Five Things Employers Need to Know

    Colorado Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Pool Systems, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.

    California Supreme Court Holds Insured Entitled to Coverage Under CGL Policy for Negligent Hiring

    Phoenix Flood Victims Can’t Catch a Break as Storm Nears

    Rancosky Adopts Terletsky: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sets Standard for Statutory Bad Faith Claims

    Project Team Upgrades Va. General Assembly

    Quick Note: Choice of Law Provisions

    The Peak of Hurricane Season Is Here: How to Manage Risks Before They Manage You

    Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case

    Housing Gains Not Leading to Hiring

    New Home for the Aged Suffers Construction Defects

    BWB&O Partner Jack Briscoe and Associate Anoushe Marandjian Win Summary Judgment Motion on Behalf of Homeowner Client!

    Affirmed

    Condo Building Hits Highest Share of Canada Market Since 1971

    Narrow Promissory Estoppel Exception to Create Insurance Coverage

    Considerations in Obtaining a Mechanic’s Lien in Maryland (Don’t try this at home)

    How Machine Learning Can Help with Urban Development

    White and Williams LLP is Honored to be Recognized Among the 2026 Best Law Firms Ranked by Best Lawyers®

    Insurer Sued for Altering Policies after Claim

    COVID-19 Response: Essential Business Operations: a High-Stakes Question Under Proliferating “Stay at Home” Orders

    Wall Street Journal Analyzes the Housing Market Direction

    New Spending Measure Has Big Potential Infrastructure Boost

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Selected to Best Lawyers in America© Orange County and as Attorneys of the Year 2018

    Negligence Per Se Claim Based Upon Failure to Pay Benefits Fails

    A Look at Trending Legislative Changes Impacting Workers' Comp

    Insurer Liable for Bad Faith Despite Actions of Insured Contributing to Excess Judgment

    Statutory Bad Faith and an Insured’s 60 Day Notice to Cure

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/24/24) – Long-Term Housing Issues in Hawaii, Underperforming REITs, and Growth in a Subset of the Hotel Sector

    New Nafta Could Settle Canada-U.S. Lumber War, Resolute CEO Says

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Insurer Must Defend Oil Company Against Entire Lawsuit

    “License and Registration, Please.” The Big Risk of Getting Busted for Working without a Proper Contractor’s License

    CGL Insurer’s Duty To Defend Broader Than Duty To Indemnify And Based On Allegations In Underlying Complaint

    Meet BWBO’s 2024 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars!

    Spearin Doctrine 100 Years Old and Still Thriving in the Design-Build Delivery World

    Just Decided – New Jersey Supreme Court: Insurers Can Look To Extrinsic Evidence To Deny a Defense
    Corporate Profile

    HOOD RIVER COUNTY OREGON ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Hood River County, Oregon Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Hood River County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Hood River County, Oregon

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Voluntary Dismissal of an Indemnity Claim Does Not Make the Subcontractor a “Prevailing Party,” Washington Court of Appeals Holds

    September 21, 2026 —
    In King County v. Walsh Construction Company II, LLC, No. 86503-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2025), an unpublished decision from Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals, the Court affirmed the denial of a subcontractor’s request for prevailing-party attorney fees under an indemnity clause after the general contractor voluntarily dismissed its indemnity claims. Because the indemnity claim was no longer live and no determination of fault had occurred, the Court held that the trial court did not err in denying the request. ACS represented Walsh, the general contractor, in securing the denial of the fee request at the trial court that the Court of Appeals affirmed. A Pass-Through Indemnity Claim That Ended Before Fault Was Decided The dispute arose out of a public works contract under which King County hired Walsh Construction Company II, LLC (“Walsh”) to construct and install a conveyance pipeline. After the pipeline broke, King County sued Walsh for breach of contract and warranty, expressly identifying both Walsh and its subcontractor, Mears Group Inc., (“Mears”) as responsible. Walsh tendered defense and indemnity to Mears under the subcontract. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Margarita Kutsin, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Ms. Kutsin may be contacted at margarita.kutsin@acslawyers.com

    Rogue AI — Is Your Company Prepared?

    September 28, 2026 —
    The recent wave of "rogue AI" incidents should be a wake-up call for every business leader and risk manager paying attention. Recent accounts document a sobering reality: AI systems from multiple leading AI developers have each escaped controlled testing environments and caused real-world harm—compromising outside infrastructure, exploiting third-party vulnerabilities, and even canceling another person's reservation to help a user jump a waitlist. These aren't hypotheticals from a sci-fi movie. They happened this summer. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...