BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness De Witt County Texas townhome construction expert witness De Witt County Texas mid-rise construction expert witness De Witt County Texas high-rise construction expert witness De Witt County Texas parking structure expert witness De Witt County Texas multi family housing expert witness De Witt County Texas hospital construction expert witness De Witt County Texas industrial building expert witness De Witt County Texas structural steel construction expert witness De Witt County Texas Subterranean parking expert witness De Witt County Texas tract home expert witness De Witt County Texas retail construction expert witness De Witt County Texas Medical building expert witness De Witt County Texas condominiums expert witness De Witt County Texas condominium expert witness De Witt County Texas custom home expert witness De Witt County Texas custom homes expert witness De Witt County Texas landscaping construction expert witness De Witt County Texas low-income housing expert witness De Witt County Texas housing expert witness De Witt County Texas institutional building expert witness De Witt County Texas casino resort expert witness De Witt County Texas
    De Witt County Texas construction project management expert witnessesDe Witt County Texas roofing construction expertDe Witt County Texas construction forensic expert witnessDe Witt County Texas expert witness roofingDe Witt County Texas window expert witnessDe Witt County Texas expert witness windowsDe Witt County Texas stucco expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    De Witt County, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines De Witt County Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Victoria
    Local # 4572
    5105 E Airline Rd
    Victoria, TX 77904

    De Witt County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Victoria
    Local # 4572
    5105 E Airline Rd
    Victoria, TX 77904

    De Witt County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Galveston Area Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 4533
    P O Box 1037
    Santa Fe, TX 77517

    De Witt County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Galveston Area Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 4533
    P O Box 1037
    Santa Fe, TX 77517

    De Witt County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater San Antonio
    Local # 4560
    3625 Paesanos Parkwary
    San Antonio, TX 78231

    De Witt County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater San Antonio
    Local # 4560
    3625 Paesanos Parkwary
    San Antonio, TX 78231

    De Witt County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater New Braunfels Home Builders Association
    Local # 4503
    625 W San Antonio St
    New Braunfels, TX 78130

    De Witt County Texas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For De Witt County Texas


    Haight’s Sacramento Office Has Moved

    Lewis Brisbois Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Insurance Law, Mass Tort/Class Actions Defense by U.S. News/Best Lawyers

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeff Saab and Associate Shanna Carter on Another Big Win at Arbitration!

    Quick Note: Be Careful with Pay if Paid Clauses (Both Subcontractors and General Contractors)

    A Lack of Sophistication With the Construction Contract Can Play Out In an Ugly Dispute

    Florida Condo Collapse Shows Town’s Rich, Middle-Class Divide

    NAHB Reports on U.S. Jobs Created from Home Building

    Federal District Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Against Implementation of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Final Rule

    Trends in Project Delivery Methods in Construction

    Third Circuit Holds That Duty to Indemnify "Follows" Duty to Defend

    Grupo Mexico Spill Sparks Public Scrutiny of $150 Million Mop-Up

    Super Lawyers Names Five White and Williams LLP Attorneys to its Metro New York Lists

    Where There’s Smoke, Is There Coverage? A Closer Look at Bottega, LLC v. National Surety and Gharibian v. Wawanesa

    Whose Employee is it Anyway?: Federal Court Finds No Coverage for Injured Subcontractor's Claim Based on Modified Employer's Liability Exclusion

    Haight has been named by Best Law Firms® as a Tier 1, 2 and 3 National Firm in Three Practice Areas in 2024

    Climate Change a Factor in 'Unprecedented' South Asia Floods

    Avoiding Project Planning Disasters: How to Spot Problem Projects

    BWB&O Expands to North San Diego

    Withholding Payment or Having Your Payment Withheld Due to Disputes on Other Projects: Know Your Rights to Offset

    Remembering Joseph H. Foster

    Is The Enforceability Of A No-Damage-For-Delay Provision Inappropriate For Summary Judgment

    Hunton Insurance Group Advises Policyholders on Issues That Arise With Wildfire Claims and Coverage – A Seven-Part Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series

    Chicago’s Bungalows Are Where the City Comes Together

    New Pedestrian, Utility Bridge Takes Shape on Everett Waterfront

    When is a Contract not a Contract?

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    Manhattan Home Prices Jump to a Record as Buyers Compete

    Despite Feds' Raised Bar, 2.8B Massachusetts Offshore Wind Project Presses On

    Zero-Energy Commercial Buildings Increase as Contractors Focus on Sustainability

    Construction Up in United States

    Construction Goes Green in Orange County

    Battle of “Other Insurance” Clauses

    Bidders Shortlisted as Oroville Dam Work Schedule is Set

    California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

    DE Confirms Robust D&O Protection Despite Company Demise

    Examining Construction Defect as Occurrence in Recent Case Law and Litigation

    $24 Million Verdict Against Material Supplier Overturned Where Plaintiff Failed to Prove Supplier’s Negligence or Breach of Contract Caused an SB800 Violation

    New York’s Lawsky Proposes Changes to Reduce Home Foreclosures

    Contractors Struggle with Cash & Difficult Payment Terms, Could Benefit From Legal Advice, According to New Survey

    In Kansas City, a First-Ever Stadium Designed for Women’s Sports Takes the Field

    Snell & Wilmer’s Los Angeles Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Los Angeles Business Journal

    Will AI Completely Transform Our Use of Computers?

    Benefits and Pitfalls of Partnerships Between Companies

    Location, Location, Location—Even in Construction Liens

    New Window Insulation Introduced to U.S. Market

    Pollution Created by Business Does Not Deprive Insured of Coverage

    A Look at Business and Professions Code Section 7031

    It’s That Time of Year: Contract Review Time

    Damage to Plaintiffs' Home Caused By Unmoored Boats Survives Surface Water Exclusion

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars
    Corporate Profile

    DE WITT COUNTY TEXAS ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the De Witt County, Texas Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to De Witt County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    De Witt County, Texas

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    May 05, 2026 —
    Construction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at Gilbane chair company for Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities. In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites. Reprinted courtesy of Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight leads in recognized Construction Litigation Attorneys

    September 01, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight is pleased to announce its leading recognition in the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers magazine. With ten members named, ACS has more recognized Construction Litigation attorneys than any other firm on the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers list, compared to three at the next closest firm. Two ACS members were also recognized on the 2026 Washington Rising Stars list. Super Lawyers selects these recognized lawyers by using a patented multiphase selection process. First, lawyers enter the candidate pool by being nominated by their peers or by being identified by managing partner surveys, third-party feedback, or the Super Lawyersresearch team. Next, Super Lawyersconducts an independently researched evaluation using twelve indicators of professional achievement and peer recognition: verdicts/settlements, transactions, representative clients, experience, honors/awards, special licenses/certifications, position within a law firm, bar and/or professional activity, pro bono and community service, scholarly lectures/writings, education/employment background, and other outstanding achievements. Then, candidates with the highest point totals serve on a Blue Ribbon panel, evaluating other candidates within their primary practice area. Finally, only 5% of attorneys are selected for the Super Lawyers list, and 2.5% of attorneys are selected for the Rising Stars list. More information about the Super Lawyers Selection Process can be found here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    June 22, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani’s Hartford, Connecticut, and Dallas offices recently secured a complete defense judgment and recovery of attorney’s fees and costs in an arbitration on behalf of a longtime client, concluding a dispute that lasted several years and traversed multiple jurisdictions. The dispute initially arose in Texas state court, and almost immediately, the claimant began pursuing the matter aggressively, a pattern that continued until the day judgment was entered in GRSM’s client’s favor. GRSM’s team mounted a strong defense, achieving an early success in compelling mandatory arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Over 50 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 7th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

    September 01, 2026 —
    56 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 26 offices have been named to the 7th edition of “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.” Congratulations to the following attorneys on this recognition! You can see the full list of Lewis Brisbois attorneys named to Best Lawyers' 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America here. Akron, OH
    • Partner Meleah M. Skillern - Commercial Litigation
    Atlanta, GA
    • Partner Catherine Crawley - Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; and Transportation Law
    • Associate Davis Lackey - Insurance Law; and Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Secures $42.4 Million Award for Ventana DBS LLC in Philadelphia Marriott Construction Litigation

    July 27, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Construction and Surety Practice attorneys secured a significant victory for client Ventana DBS LLC in a complex commercial construction dispute before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Commerce Division. The trial team, led by Bill Taylor, retired Partner, and Craig O'Neill, Co-Chair of the Construction and Surety Practice Group, with support from Lindsay Liebman, Counsel, Zachary Roth, Partner, Kristen Nichols Wright, Associate, and Sue Ferrante, Legal Secretary, obtained a $42.4 million award on Ventana's claims for unpaid work, delay costs, CASPA penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees and other project-related costs arising from the construction of the Marriott W/Element Hotel Project in Philadelphia. To achieve this result, the White and Williams team managed an extensive discovery period over the course of four-years of litigation, conducted over sixty depositions, participated in court-ordered mediation and arbitration proceedings, and successfully represented Ventana during a bifurcated trial that spanned over the course of a year. Reprinted courtesy of Craig O'Neill, White and Williams, Lindsay Liebman, White and Williams, Kristen Nichols Wright, White and Williams, Zachary Roth, White and Williams and William Taylor, White and Williams Mr. O'Neill may be contacted at oneillc@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Liebman may be contacted at liebmanl@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Wright may be contacted at wrightk@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Roth may be contacted at rothz@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Taylor may be contacted at taylorw@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Federal Court Strikes Down New York’s Climate Superfund Act: What It Means for the “Polluter Pays” Movement

    September 28, 2026 —
    A federal judge in the Northern District of New York has struck down New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act, ruling that the “polluter pays” climate law is preempted by federal law and “simply beyond the limits of state law.” The court concluded that the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not authorize New York’s compensation scheme, which calculates liability based on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions attributable to worldwide fossil fuel extraction and refining. It separately held that any cost-recovery demand against a foreign producer would be preempted under the constitutional foreign affairs doctrine, which limits state intrusion into matters committed predominantly to the federal government. The court directed the parties to file a status report by September 14, leaving the form of further relief unresolved. In practical terms, the court has decided that the Act is preempted and cannot be enforced but has not yet determined the precise terms of its final order, including whether to formally enjoin its enforcement. The decision in West Virginia v. James, Case No. 1:25-cv-00168 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2026), issued by Chief U.S. District Judge Brenda K. Sannes, who was appointed by President Obama, marks the first judicial invalidation of a state climate superfund statute and carries significant implications for the climate superfund landscape and the three remaining lawsuits challenging these laws. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal

    June 08, 2026 —
    The mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer. Delay to Run the Statute of Limitations Following Hurricane Irma, a condominium association suffered roof and exterior envelope damage, reported an insurance claim, and submitted a sworn proof of loss to its property insurer in compliance with Florida Statute § 627.70132 (2020). The statute establishes a timeframe within which a policyholder must submit a claim for hurricane damage. Reprinted courtesy of Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Machaella Reisman, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Cary D. Steklof, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Ms. Reisman may be contacted at reismanm@hunton.com Mr. Steklof may be contacted at csteklof@hunton.com Read the full story...