BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Custer County Montana structural steel construction expert witness Custer County Montana institutional building expert witness Custer County Montana casino resort expert witness Custer County Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Custer County Montana tract home expert witness Custer County Montana condominiums expert witness Custer County Montana industrial building expert witness Custer County Montana townhome construction expert witness Custer County Montana office building expert witness Custer County Montana parking structure expert witness Custer County Montana high-rise construction expert witness Custer County Montana Medical building expert witness Custer County Montana custom homes expert witness Custer County Montana low-income housing expert witness Custer County Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Custer County Montana retail construction expert witness Custer County Montana production housing expert witness Custer County Montana multi family housing expert witness Custer County Montana hospital construction expert witness Custer County Montana housing expert witness Custer County Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Custer County Montana
    Custer County Montana hospital construction expert witnessCuster County Montana roofing construction expertCuster County Montana consulting engineersCuster County Montana defective construction expertCuster County Montana contractor expert witnessCuster County Montana structural concrete expertCuster County Montana construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Custer County, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Custer County Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601

    Custer County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601

    Custer County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840

    Custer County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840

    Custer County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711
    Custer County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711
    Custer County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602

    Custer County Montana Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Custer County Montana


    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provisions

    SunEdison Gets Shinsei Bank Funding for Japan Solar Power Plant

    Mitigate Construction Risk Through Use of Contingency

    The Requirement to Post Collateral Under General Agreement of Indemnity Is Real

    Arizona Rooftop Safety: Is it Adequate or Substandard?

    How Retro-Commissioning Can Extend the Life of a Building—and the Planet

    Be Strategic When Suing a Manufacturer Under a Warranty with an Arbitration Provision

    Insurer Obligated to Cover Preventative Remediation of Construction Defects

    Focusing on Design Elements of the 2014 World Cup Stadiums

    The Heat Is On

    Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Treble Damages in Washington DC Condominium Construction Defect Cases

    New Insurance Case: Owners'​ Insurance Barred in Reimbursement Action against Tenant

    Civility Is Key in Construction Defect Mediation

    Patti Santelle Honored by Rutgers School of Law with Arthur E. Armitage Sr. Distinguished Alumni Award

    Significant Ruling in PFAS Litigation Could Impact Insurance Coverage

    Mass-Timber Furnished Apartments Fare Well in Fire Tests

    Standard of Care

    In a Win for Property Owners California Court Expands and Clarifies Privette Doctrine

    Home Prices Up in Metro Regions

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    What to Expect From the New Self-Retracting Devices Standard

    Quick Note: Discretion in Determining Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees

    Invest In America Act Offers 494 Billion In Funding to U.S. Infrastructure and Millions of New Jobs

    Texas EIFS Case May Have Future Implications for Construction Defects

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jessica Garland as Its Newest Partner

    The Cost of Overlooking Jury Fees

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds that Subrogation Waiver Does Not Violate Statute Prohibiting Limitation on Tort Liability in Construction Contracts

    Joint Venture Dispute Over Profits

    Measures Landlords and Property Managers Can Take in Response to a Reported COVID-19 Infection

    Where Do We Go From Here?

    Anti-Fracking Win in N.Y. Court May Deal Blow to Industry

    Kentucky Supreme Court Creates New “Goldilocks Zone” to Limit Opinions of Biomechanical Experts

    New York State Legislature Reintroduces Bills to Extend Mortgage Recording Tax to Mezzanine Debt and Preferred Equity

    Colorado General Assembly Sets Forth Prerequisites for an Insurance Company to Use Failure to Cooperate as a Defense to a Claim for First Party Insurance Benefits

    No Additional Insured Coverage for Subcontractor's Work Outside Policy Period

    New Jersey Condominium Owners Sue FEMA

    The Independent Tort Doctrine (And Its Importance)

    Seventh Circuit Confirms Additional Insured's Coverage for Alleged Construction Defects

    Hunton Insurance Group Advises Policyholders on Issues That Arise With Wildfire Claims and Coverage – A Seven-Part Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series

    Condo Board Goes after Insurer for Construction Defect Settlement

    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is Proud to Announce Jeannette Garcia Has Been Elected as Secretary of the Hispanic Bar Association of Orange County!

    Interior Designer Licensure

    PSA: Performing Construction Work in Virginia Requires a Contractor’s License

    Construction Companies Can Be Liable for “Secondary Exposure” of Asbestos to Household Members

    Norfolk Southern Agrees to $310M Settlement With Feds Over 2023 Ohio Derailment

    SE 2050 Is In Quixotic Pursuit of Eliminating Embodied Carbon in Building Structures

    Dispute between City and Construction Company Over Unsightly Arches

    Business Solutions Alert: Homeowners' Complaint for Breach of Loan Modification Agreement Can Proceed Past Pleading Stage

    Buffett’s $11 Million Beach House Is Still on the Market
    Corporate Profile

    CUSTER COUNTY MONTANA ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Custer County, Montana Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Custer County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Custer County, Montana

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    September 01, 2026 —
    One of the statutory vehicles to shorten a construction lienor’s statute of limitations to foreclose on a construction lien is through a “show cause” summons that essentially requires the lienor to foreclose on the lien within 20 days from receipt of the “show cause” summons. This is a statutory procedure under Florida’s Lien Law in Fla. Stat. s. 713.21(4). If a lienor receives a “show cause” summons and lawsuit, the lienor should, without delay, counterclaim or file a separate lien foreclosure lawsuit within the 20-day period without exception. This is provided the lienor wants to move forward with its lien. If a lienor does not, the lien will be discharged of record. If you are a lienor and receive a “show cause” summons, please immediately consult with construction counsel that can best advise you and perfect your lien rights. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements

    April 08, 2026 —
    On March 11, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced a consent order with a real estate-related lender’s subsidiary, and affiliated individuals resolving allegations that the company violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act by deceptively marketing mortgage-backed “Homeowner Benefit Agreements” to financially struggling homeowners. According to the complaint, the company offered homeowners relatively small upfront cash payments, typically less than $1,500, in exchange for a 40-year exclusive right to act as the listing broker if the homeowner later sold the property. The Attorney General alleged that the agreements also triggered substantial payment obligations upon other transfers, including death or foreclosure, and that the transactions were secured by recorded mortgages that could interfere with refinancing, home-equity access, or the ability to sell the home. The complaint further alleged that the company marketed the product to vulnerable consumers searching for loans or public benefits while obscuring the true nature of the transaction. Reprinted courtesy of A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Sheppard, Mehul N. Madia, Sheppard and Maxwell Earp-Thomas, Sheppard Mr. Dhaliwal may be contacted at adhaliwal@sheppard.com Mr. Madia may be contacted at mmadia@sheppard.com Mr. Earp-Thomas may be contacted at mearp-thomas@sheppard.com Read the full story...

    Dispute Erupts Into Public Over Castro Theater Rehab Project Costs

    September 08, 2026 —
    As it was about to start an arbitration of final payments on a complex theater renovation, the entertainment company that leases San Francisco's landmark Castro Theatre has filed a state court trademark violation lawsuit seeking to bar the contractor from publicizing as a success its work for the owner on that and other projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It

    July 27, 2026 —
    When you win a bid, you might be singing that everything is going your way. Then something goes wrong. The owner hands you defective plans, sits on RFI responses or other critical information, or otherwise upends the work. The costs pile up through no fault of your own. You feel wronged, and you want to be made whole. But a feeling that you got burned is not enough. To recover, that feeling has to become something the law recognizes as damages. So, what are damages, and how do you prove them? At bottom, contract damages are the money that puts the non-breaching party (i.e., the party that doesn’t breach the contract) in the position it would have occupied had the contract been performed. Reprinted courtesy of Bradley E. Sands, Jones Walker LLP and Katie McCracken, Summer Associate, University of Georgia School of Law Read the full story...
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com