BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Columbia County Arkansas housing expert witness Columbia County Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Columbia County Arkansas tract home expert witness Columbia County Arkansas industrial building expert witness Columbia County Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Columbia County Arkansas custom homes expert witness Columbia County Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Columbia County Arkansas custom home expert witness Columbia County Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Columbia County Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Columbia County Arkansas institutional building expert witness Columbia County Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Columbia County Arkansas retail construction expert witness Columbia County Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Columbia County Arkansas condominiums expert witness Columbia County Arkansas production housing expert witness Columbia County Arkansas parking structure expert witness Columbia County Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Columbia County Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Columbia County Arkansas condominium expert witness Columbia County Arkansas Medical building expert witness Columbia County Arkansas
    Columbia County Arkansas construction defect expert witnessColumbia County Arkansas defective construction expertColumbia County Arkansas construction expert witness consultantColumbia County Arkansas window expert witnessColumbia County Arkansas contractor expert witnessColumbia County Arkansas consulting general contractorColumbia County Arkansas construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Columbia County, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Columbia County Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Clark County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0403
    PO Box 502
    Arkadelphia, AR 71923
    Columbia County Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clark County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0403
    PO Box 502
    Arkadelphia, AR 71923
    Columbia County Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hot Springs Arkansas
    Local # 0440
    PO Box 1046
    Hot Springs, AR 71902

    Columbia County Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hot Springs Arkansas
    Local # 0440
    PO Box 1046
    Hot Springs, AR 71902

    Columbia County Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Saline Home Builders Association
    Local # 0458
    PO Box 151
    Benton, AR 72018

    Columbia County Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Saline Home Builders Association
    Local # 0458
    PO Box 151
    Benton, AR 72018

    Columbia County Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Arkansas Home Builders Association - State
    Local # 0400
    1400 W Markham St Ste 305
    Little Rock, AR 72201

    Columbia County Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Columbia County Arkansas


    It’s Not Just the Millennium Tower That’s Sinking in San Francisco

    The Construction Project is Late—Allocation of Delay

    Trump Administration Issues Proposed 'Waters of the U.S.' Rule

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces New Partners

    What I Love and Hate About Updating My Contracts From an Owners’ Perspective

    No Expert Testimony for You: Maryland Federal Court Deems Expert Testimony Inadmissible

    Power of Workers Compensation Immunity on Construction Project

    New York Court Grants Insured's Motion to Dismiss Construction Defect Case and Awards Fees to Insured

    Continuing Breach Doctrine

    Using Ambient Sound as Construction Progress Indicator

    Title II under ADA Applicable to Public Rights-of-Way, Parks and Other Recreation Areas

    Unrelated Claims Against Architects Amount to Two Different Claims

    CGL Policy Covering Attorney’s Fees in Property Damage Claims

    Absent Separate Covered Peril, Ensuing Loss is Not Applicable

    Save a Legal Fee: Prevent Costly Lawsuits With Claim Limitation Clauses

    Insurer's Failure to Settle Does Not Justify Multiple Damages under Unfair Claims Settlement Law

    Fort Lauderdale Team Secures Appellate Win Affirming Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in High-Stakes Negligence Case

    Get Your Contracts Lean- Its Better than Dieting

    How the Cumulative Impact Theory has been Defined

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2021 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!

    Alleged Defective Water Pump Leads to 900K in Damages

    No Signature? Potentially No Problem for Sureties Enforcing a Bond’s Forum Selection Clause

    Newport Beach Attorneys John Toohey and Nick Rodriguez Receive Full Defense Verdict

    Contractor’s Claim for Interest on Subcontractor’s Defective Work Claim Gains Mixed Results

    President Trump Issued Two New EOs on Energy Infrastructure and Federal Energy Policy

    California Supreme Court Finds that When it Comes to Intentional Interference Claims, Public Works Projects are Just Different, Special Even

    Insurance Law Alert: Ambiguous Producer Agreement Makes Agent-Broker Status a Jury Question

    Natural Disasters’ Impact on Construction in the United States

    Construction Warranties: Have You Seen Me Lately?

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    24/7 Wall Street Reported on Eight Housing Markets at All-Time Highs

    Starting July 1, 2020 General Contractors are “Employers” for All Workers on Their Jobsite

    New California Standards Go into Effect July 1st

    Nevada Senate Minority Leader Confident about Construction Defect Bill

    Key Takeaways For Employers in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Halt to OSHA’s Vax/Testing Mandate

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Client in Wrongful Death Lawsuit over Construction Incident

    ASCE Statement on Senate Passage Of Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    Supreme Court Limits EPA’s Options for Wastewater Discharge Permits

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “A Close Call?”

    Taking Service Network Planning to the Next Level

    Todd Ehrenreich Joins International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    Pennsylvania Sues Firms to Recoup Harrisburg Incinerator Losses

    DOJ to Prosecute Philadelphia Roofing Company for Worker’s Death

    Court Rejects Insurer's Argument That Two Triggers Required

    Georgia Supreme Court Says Construction Defects Can Be an “Occurrence”

    Why Federal and State Agencies are Considering Converting from a “Gallons Consumed” to a “Road Usage” Tax – And What are the Risks to the Consumer?
    Corporate Profile

    COLUMBIA COUNTY ARKANSAS ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Columbia County, Arkansas Roofing Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Columbia County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Columbia County, Arkansas

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    June 29, 2026 —
    The Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    July 20, 2026 —
    The Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale. The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark O. Morris, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Morris may be contacted at mmorris@swlaw.com

    When Your Scheduler Hallucinates: Managing AI Risk on the Job Site

    March 03, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence has moved from the conference room to the construction site. Contractors are using AI-powered tools to predict schedule delays, monitor safety through drone footage, optimize equipment maintenance and flag potential hazards in real time. These tools deliver genuine efficiency gains, but they also introduce risks that most construction contracts do not anticipate and many project teams aren’t yet equipped to manage. The problem is that AI tools are probabilistic and not determinative, meaning that they can “hallucinate”: generating confident, but completely wrong, information. Your AI scheduling software might therefore predict a delay that never materializes, causing unnecessary resource mobilization. Your drone monitoring might flag a nonexistent safety hazard, stopping work and costing productivity. Or worse, it might miss a real hazard entirely. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Loring, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Loring may be contacted at jloring@joneswalker.com

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    June 23, 2026 —
    n a recent property insurance coverage dispute, an issue on appeal pertained to the “prejudice” jury instruction associated with the insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. The trial court found that the prejudice only pertained to prompt notice and not other post-loss policy conditions. This was reversed on appeal as prejudice applied to ALL the post loss policy conditions that the insured failed to comply with, not just the prompt notice requirement. The prejudice presumption applies to all affirmative defenses regarding an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. Consider this discussion when dealing with an insurer raising prejudice as an affirmative defense to do an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions, and the associated burdens of proof: On appeal, [the insurer] contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury that the presumption of prejudice was inapplicable to all of its post-loss obligation defenses except prompt notice. We agree. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Fort Lauderdale Associate Secures Summary Judgment in Rare Premises Liability Win

    February 23, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale associate Kyle Hollander recently secured a summary judgment victory for his client, Winn-Dixie, in a contested premises liability case. This was a hotly disputed liability case of water on the floor near an ice cooler with surveillance footage of a customer constantly bringing bags of ice to and from the cooler to the register. The plaintiff unknowingly stepped into the area of dripped melted ice and fell. Kyle successfully argued based on the plaintiff’s own deposition testimony and the surveillance footage that Winn-Dixie didn’t have the requisite actual notice. Additionally, Kyle argued that the brief duration the condition remained on the floor was legally insufficient to establish constructive notice under Florida law. The Court agreed, finding that the evidence would not survive a directed verdict and granting summary judgment in favor of the defense. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    GRSM Ranked Among Texas’ 50 Largest Law Firms by Texas Lawyer

    August 03, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has been recognized byTexas Lawyer in its 2026 Texas 100 ranking, earning the No. 49 spot among the state’s largest law firms by attorney headcount. The annual report spotlights the continued strength of Texas’ legal market, with firms across the state collectively increasing lawyer headcount by 2% in 2025. “Texas continues to be one of the country’s most thriving legal and business markets, and we are proud to be recognized among the state’s largest law firms,” said Laura De Santos, Regional Oversight Partner for Texas. “Our continued growth shows the confidence our clients place in us, the exceptional talent of our attorneys, and our commitment to delivering seamless, high-quality legal services throughout Texas and across our 50-state platform.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

    March 24, 2026 —
    Applying California law, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that water damage caused by a leaking pipe over time was not covered under the insured’s homeowners’ policy. Mojica v. State Farm General Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32405 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025). A small hole, slightly larger than a pen tip in size, developed in a pressurized hot water pipe. The resulting leak lasted for nearly six days and released enough water to saturate and ruin all the subflooring and flooring in the insureds’ home. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com