BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Clarke County Mississippi hospital construction expert witness Clarke County Mississippi Medical building expert witness Clarke County Mississippi townhome construction expert witness Clarke County Mississippi condominiums expert witness Clarke County Mississippi parking structure expert witness Clarke County Mississippi landscaping construction expert witness Clarke County Mississippi tract home expert witness Clarke County Mississippi high-rise construction expert witness Clarke County Mississippi institutional building expert witness Clarke County Mississippi structural steel construction expert witness Clarke County Mississippi Subterranean parking expert witness Clarke County Mississippi custom home expert witness Clarke County Mississippi mid-rise construction expert witness Clarke County Mississippi industrial building expert witness Clarke County Mississippi production housing expert witness Clarke County Mississippi condominium expert witness Clarke County Mississippi office building expert witness Clarke County Mississippi retail construction expert witness Clarke County Mississippi casino resort expert witness Clarke County Mississippi housing expert witness Clarke County Mississippi multi family housing expert witness Clarke County Mississippi
    Clarke County Mississippi expert witness concrete failureClarke County Mississippi ada design expert witnessClarke County Mississippi engineering expert witnessClarke County Mississippi eifs expert witnessClarke County Mississippi construction project management expert witnessClarke County Mississippi consulting general contractorClarke County Mississippi construction expert testimony
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Roofing Expert Witness Builders Information
    Clarke County, Mississippi

    Mississippi Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1166/SB1081, HB722/SB2368) The New Home Warranty Act stipulates warranties for one-year and six-year periods limits types of defects; defines specific defects and exclusions such as outbuildings, detached garages, detached carports, swimming pools, recreational facilities, driveways, walkways, patios, boundary walls, retaining walls, bulkheads, fences, landscaping, off-site improvements, drainage, utilities, etc.; additional exclusions are negligence, improper maintenance, or improper operation, failure to comply with warranty requirements of manufacturer, inadequate ventilation, lack of mitigation, normal wear and tear, insect damage or "rotting of any kind", mold or mold damage, consequential damages, and defects in electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, or similar fixture not manufactured by builder


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Clarke County Mississippi

    State license required for commercial jobs over $100,000, city or county jobs over $50,000.


    Roofing Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Mississippi
    Local # 2500
    PO Box 3556
    Jackson, MS 39207

    Clarke County Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mississippi
    Local # 2500
    PO Box 3556
    Jackson, MS 39207

    Clarke County Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Vicksburg
    Local # 2581
    PO Box 821035
    Vicksburg, MS 39182
    Clarke County Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Vicksburg
    Local # 2581
    PO Box 821035
    Vicksburg, MS 39182
    Clarke County Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2554
    PO Box 1860
    Ridgeland, MS 39158

    Clarke County Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2554
    PO Box 1860
    Ridgeland, MS 39158

    Clarke County Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Meridian-Miss Home Builders Association
    Local # 2536
    8589 A C Brown Road
    Meridian, MS 39305
    Clarke County Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Roofing Expert Witness News and Information
    For Clarke County Mississippi


    Businesspeople to Nevada: Revoke the Construction Defect Laws

    Court Ends Trump Shutdown of NY's $5B Empire Wind, Second Offshore Project Revived

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “It’s One, Two… Eight Strikes: You’re Out!”

    Safeguarding the U.S. Construction Industry from Unfair Competition Abroad

    The Cheap and Easy Climate Fix That Can Cool the Planet Fast

    Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress

    How Your Disgruntled Client Can Turn Into Your Very Own Car Crash! (and How to Avoid It) (Law Tips)

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    Let the 90-Day Countdown Begin

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (2/19/25) – An Embrace of AI, A Squeeze on Construction and a Jump in Mortgage Refinance Demand

    Construction Managers, Are You Exposing Yourselves to Labor Law Liability?

    Insurer Need Not Pay for Rejected Defense When No Reservation of Rights Issued

    Firm Seeks to Squash Subpoena in Coverage CD Case

    Texas Federal Court Upholds Professional Services Exclusion to Preclude Duty to Defend

    How Mansions Can Intensify Wildfires

    Rise in Home Building Helps Other Job Sectors

    Breaking the Impasse by Understanding Blame

    Attorneys' Fee Clauses are Engraved Invitations to Sue

    The Dog Ate My Exclusion! – Georgia Federal Court: No Reformation to Add Pollution Exclusion

    Canada Housing Surprises Again With July Starts Increase

    Consequential Damages Flowing from Construction Defect Not Covered Under Florida Law

    How the California and Maui Wildfires Will Affect Future Construction Projects

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael Logan and Associate Christian Romaguera Obtain Voluntary Dismissal in Favor of Construction Company Under the Vertical Immunity Doctrine

    The Requirement to State a “Sum Certain” No Longer a Jurisdictional Bar to Government Contract Claims

    Contract Change #1- Insurance in the A201 (law note)

    US Appeals Court Slams FERC on Long-Muddled State Environmental Permits

    Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea

    In Midst of Construction Defect Lawsuit, City Center Seeks Refinancing

    Michael Baker Intl. Settles Federal Pay Bias Allegations

    Alert: AAA Construction Industry Rules Update

    Musings: Moving or Going into a New Service Area, There is More to It Than Just…

    No Coverage Where Cracks in Basement Walls Do Not Amount to Sudden Collapse

    Challenging a Termination for Default

    Massachusetts Judge Holds That Insurer Breached Its Duty To Defend Lawsuit After Chemical Spill

    Benefit of the Coblentz Agreement and Consent Judgment

    Chinese Lead $92 Billion of U.S. Home Sales to Foreigners

    No Coverage for Collapse of Building

    Ninth Circuit Rules Supreme Court’s Two-Part Test of Implied Certification under the False Claims Act Mandatory

    Another Reminder that Your Construction Contract Language Matters

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    3D Printing Innovations Enhance Building Safety

    Home Prices Up, Inventory Down

    Bar to Raise on Green Standard

    Dorian’s Wrath: How Event Cancellation Insurance Helps Businesses Recoup Losses from Severe Weather

    It’s Called “Delegation” – Basic Risks and Considerations for Delegated Design on Projects

    Policy Reformed to Add New Building Owner as Additional Insured

    David M. McLain, Esq. to Speak at the 2014 CLM Claims College

    Failing to Adopt a Comprehensive Cyber Plan Can Lead to Disaster

    National Engineering and Public Works Roadshow Highlights Low Battery Seawall Restoration Project in Charleston

    Justin Clark Joins Newmeyer & Dillion’s Walnut Creek Branch as its Newest Associate
    Corporate Profile

    CLARKE COUNTY MISSISSIPPI ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Clarke County, Mississippi Roofing Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Clarke County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Roofing Expert Witness News & Info
    Clarke County, Mississippi

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    July 20, 2026 —
    A settlement agreement does not need to be executed for it to be enforceable as long as there was a MEETING OF THE MINDS. The same rings true for any contract regardless of whether the contract is signed – THERE NEEDS TO BE A MEETING OF THE MINDS. In a recent case dealing with the settlement agreement on a construction lien, the essential settlement terms (money and mutual release) were memorialized in an e-mail exchange between the parties (owner and subcontractor). The settlement required the owner to pay the principal amount plus some attorney’s fees and then a mutual general release would be prepared. In response to the confirmatory email, the owner sent a check, which the subcontractor deposited, but the owner refused to sign the release signed and sent by the subcontractor. The owner further claimed it doesn’t need to pay the attorney’s fees because the lien amount was paid in full. The subcontractor sued arguing the owner breached the terms of the settlement. The appellate court agreed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools

    April 14, 2026 —
    Every time an employee pastes proprietary source code, a customer list, or a confidential business strategy into ChatGPT, Claude, or Google Gemini, they may be quietly dismantling the legal protections that make those secrets worth protecting. Courts and regulators are only beginning to grapple with this problem, and right now, the burden of preventing it falls squarely on employers. The Legal Stakes Under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) as adopted across most states, a trade secret plaintiff must show that the information at issue was subject to reasonable measures to maintain its secrecy. Courts have historically credited measures like confidentiality agreements, physical access controls, and employee training—but those safeguards were designed for a world of thumb drives and disgruntled employees. They were not built for a world where a well-meaning engineer can, in seconds, transmit an entire corpus of proprietary data to a third-party AI platform operating under terms of service that may permit the provider to use inputs for model training. Reprinted courtesy of Kazim A. Naqvi, Sheppard and John V. Mysliwiec, Sheppard Mr. Naqvi may be contacted at knaqvi@sheppard.com Mr. Mysliwiec may be contacted at jmysliwiec@sheppard.com Read the full story...

    Thank You All for 10 Years Straight of VA Super Lawyers

    May 05, 2026 —
    It is with humility and a sense of accomplishment that I announce that I have been selected for the tenth straight year to the Virginia Super Lawyers in the Construction Litigation category for 2026. Add this to my recent election to the Virginia Legal Elite in Construction and I’ve had a pretty good year. As always, I am thrilled to be included on these peer-elected lists. Your confidence in my work is very gratifying. So without further ado, thank you to my peers and those on the panel at Virginia Super Lawyers for the great honor. I feel quite proud to be part of the 5% of Virginia attorneys that made this list for 2026. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    The GKN Aerospace Chemical Release and the Laws Designed to Address It

    July 06, 2026 —
    On May 21, 2026, a 34,000-gallon storage tank at the GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California began leaking methyl methacrylate (MMA), a volatile and highly flammable industrial chemical used to manufacture high-strength acrylic plastics. GKN Aerospace makes advanced military and commercial transparencies, such as aircraft canopies, windshields, cabin windows, bullet-resistant glass, and spacecraft windows. In polymer chemistry lingo, MMA is known as a monomer. Monomers are like individual links to a chain. Under the right conditions they link up (react) with each other to form long-chained polymers, or plastics. MMA is an unstable monomer that requires controlled storage conditions to avoid setting off a polymerization (chain) reaction. According to early reports, the MMA tank at GKN Aerospace overheated. The cause of the overheating is not yet clear, but the overheating may have created conditions enabling the MMA to initiate polymerization, which in turn generated heat, which in turn generated pressure, activating the tank’s pressure-relief system and releasing MMA vapor into the atmosphere. Concerns about a runaway reaction, massive release, and explosion led the Orange County Fire Authority to order evacuation of approximately 40,000 residents and closure of thirteen schools. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    September 29, 2026 —
    Introduction Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work. Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com